vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cintas (CTAS) and Roper Technologies (ROP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cintas is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.8B vs $2.1B, roughly 1.3× Roper Technologies). Cintas runs the higher net margin — 17.7% vs 15.8%, a 1.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Roper Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.3% vs 9.3%). Roper Technologies produced more free cash flow last quarter ($507.0M vs $425.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Roper Technologies's revenue compounded faster (10.5% CAGR vs 7.9%).
Cintas Corporation is an American corporation headquartered in Mason, Ohio, which provides a range of products and services to businesses including uniforms, mats, mops, cleaning and restroom supplies, first aid and safety products, fire extinguishers and testing, and safety courses. Cintas is a publicly held company traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol CTAS and is a component of the S&P 500 Index.
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
CTAS vs ROP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.8B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $495.3M | $331.0M |
| Gross Margin | 50.4% | 69.4% |
| Operating Margin | 23.4% | 27.2% |
| Net Margin | 17.7% | 15.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.3% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.4% | 842.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.21 | $4.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $331.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $495.3M | $428.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $491.1M | $398.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $448.3M | $378.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $463.5M | $331.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $448.5M | $462.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.0M | $367.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $414.3M | $337.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 69.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 50.4% | 69.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.3% | 69.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.7% | 69.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.6% | 68.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 49.8% | 68.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.1% | 69.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 69.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.4% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.7% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.4% | 28.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.4% | 27.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.1% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 28.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.2% | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.7% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.1% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.8% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.8% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.1% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.8% | 19.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.87 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.21 | $3.97 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.20 | $3.68 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.08 | $3.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.13 | $3.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.09 | $4.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.10 | $3.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.00 | $3.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $200.8M | $382.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.4B | $9.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.5B | $18.8B |
| Total Assets | $10.1B | $34.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.54× | 0.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $382.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $200.8M | $297.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $138.1M | $320.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $264.0M | $242.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $243.4M | $372.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $122.4M | $188.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.4M | $269.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $342.0M | $251.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $18.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | $19.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $20.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $19.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.6B | $19.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $18.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $18.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $18.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $34.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.1B | $34.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | $34.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.8B | $33.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6B | $31.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4B | $31.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1B | $31.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.2B | $29.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.54× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.52× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.47× | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.47× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $531.2M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $425.0M | $507.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.2% | 24.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.07× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.8B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $531.2M | $738.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $414.5M | $869.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $635.7M | $404.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $622.0M | $528.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $441.4M | $722.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $466.7M | $755.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $693.0M | $384.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $507.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $425.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $312.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $521.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $522.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $340.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $373.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $591.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.07× | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.84× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.42× | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.34× | 1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.98× | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.03× | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.67× | 1.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CTAS
| Uniform Rental And Facility Services Segment | $2.2B | 77% |
| First Aid And Safety Services Segment | $342.2M | 12% |
| Fire Protection Services | $222.5M | 8% |
| Uniform Direct Sales | $79.8M | 3% |
ROP
Segment breakdown not available.
