vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Citi Trends Inc (CTRN) and Hillman Solutions Corp. (HLMN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hillman Solutions Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($370.1M vs $197.1M, roughly 1.9× Citi Trends Inc). Hillman Solutions Corp. runs the higher net margin — -1.3% vs -3.5%, a 2.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Citi Trends Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.1% vs 3.0%). Citi Trends Inc produced more free cash flow last quarter ($767.0K vs $-34.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Hillman Solutions Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (-1.2% CAGR vs -4.3%).
Citi Trends, Inc. is an American retail clothing chain selling discounted products targeted primarily at African-American customers.
Hillman Solutions is an American hardware manufacturing, distribution and consumer fabrication services company.
CTRN vs HLMN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $197.1M | $370.1M |
| Net Profit | $-6.9M | $-4.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -3.7% | 1.9% |
| Net Margin | -3.5% | -1.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.1% | 3.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.86 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $370.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $197.1M | $365.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $190.8M | $424.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $201.7M | $402.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $211.2M | $359.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $179.1M | $349.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $176.6M | $393.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $186.3M | $379.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-6.9M | $1.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8M | $23.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $871.0K | $15.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-14.2M | $-317.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.2M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-18.4M | $7.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.4M | $12.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.7% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.9% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.1% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.7% | 8.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.5% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.7% | -0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.0% | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.8% | 3.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.02 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.86 | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.46 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.11 | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.70 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.86 | $-0.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.21 | $0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.42 | $0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $27.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $714.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $107.8M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $464.3M | $2.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.59× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $27.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $27.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $37.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $34.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $36.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $44.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $59.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $54.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $714.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $668.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $683.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $683.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $713.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $691.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $730.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $732.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $107.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $113.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $113.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $154.8M | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $464.3M | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $457.4M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $437.4M | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $462.8M | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $467.1M | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $506.7M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $484.1M | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.56× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.62× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $8.6M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $767.0K | $-34.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.4% | -9.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.0% | 4.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $11.9M | $22.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.6M | $30.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9M | $26.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.0M | $48.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.5M | $-655.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.4M | $43.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6M | $63.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-19.6M | $64.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-34.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $767.0K | $16.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.7M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.1M | $31.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.0M | $-21.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-20.4M | $22.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7M | $39.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.2M | $42.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | -9.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.5% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.3% | -5.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.4% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.4% | 11.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 5.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 19.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.01× | 1.13× | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.59× | 3.08× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.57× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.17× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
