vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Citi Trends Inc (CTRN) and INDEPENDENCE REALTY TRUST, INC. (IRT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Citi Trends Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($197.1M vs $165.3M, roughly 1.2× INDEPENDENCE REALTY TRUST, INC.). On growth, Citi Trends Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.1% vs 2.5%). Over the past eight quarters, INDEPENDENCE REALTY TRUST, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (2.2% CAGR vs -4.3%).
Citi Trends, Inc. is an American retail clothing chain selling discounted products targeted primarily at African-American customers.
Brandywine Realty Trust is a Philadelphia-based real estate investment trust (REIT) that invests in office buildings in Philadelphia, Washington, D.C., and Austin, Texas.
CTRN vs IRT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $197.1M | $165.3M |
| Net Profit | $-6.9M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -3.7% | — |
| Net Margin | -3.5% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 10.1% | 2.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.86 | $0.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $165.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $197.1M | $167.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $190.8M | $167.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $201.7M | $162.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $211.2M | $161.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $179.1M | $161.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $176.6M | $160.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $186.3M | $158.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-6.9M | $33.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8M | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $871.0K | $8.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-14.2M | $8.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.2M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-18.4M | $12.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.4M | $10.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.5% | 19.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.7% | 5.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.0% | -0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.4% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.8% | 6.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.86 | $0.14 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.46 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.11 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.70 | $0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.86 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.21 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.42 | $0.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $23.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $107.8M | $3.4B |
| Total Assets | $464.3M | $6.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $23.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $23.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $23.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $19.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $29.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $21.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $17.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $21.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $107.8M | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $113.2M | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.6M | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $113.2M | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.3M | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.6M | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $154.8M | $3.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $464.3M | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $457.4M | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $437.4M | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $462.8M | $6.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $467.1M | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $506.7M | $5.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $484.1M | $5.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.68× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.66× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $8.6M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $767.0K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $11.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.6M | $282.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9M | $79.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.0M | $82.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.5M | $60.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.4M | $259.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6M | $69.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-19.6M | $83.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $767.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-20.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 8.48× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.01× | 11.51× | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.59× | 10.22× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.23× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.60× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.02× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CTRN
Segment breakdown not available.
IRT
| Rental and other property revenue | $165.2M | 100% |
| Other revenue | $109.0K | 0% |