vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of COUSINS PROPERTIES INC (CUZ) and VERRA MOBILITY Corp (VRRM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
COUSINS PROPERTIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($255.0M vs $223.6M, roughly 1.1× VERRA MOBILITY Corp). VERRA MOBILITY Corp runs the higher net margin — 12.0% vs -1.4%, a 13.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, COUSINS PROPERTIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.2% vs 0.1%). COUSINS PROPERTIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($135.0M vs $9.6M). Over the past eight quarters, COUSINS PROPERTIES INC's revenue compounded faster (10.4% CAGR vs 0.3%).
Cousins Properties Incorporated is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that invests in office buildings in Atlanta, Charlotte, Austin, Phoenix, Tampa, and Chapel Hill, North Carolina. The company has developed notable properties including CNN Center, Omni Coliseum, 191 Peachtree Tower, and Emory Point in Atlanta.
Verra Mobility Corp is a leading global smart mobility technology solution provider. It delivers toll management, parking and traffic compliance enforcement, connected vehicle services, and fleet management tools, serving government transport agencies, rental car operators, commercial fleet owners, and automotive partners across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific.
CUZ vs VRRM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $255.0M | $223.6M |
| Net Profit | $-3.5M | $26.7M |
| Gross Margin | 67.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 67.5% | 23.2% |
| Net Margin | -1.4% | 12.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.2% | 0.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -125.4% | -17.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.02 | $0.17 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $223.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $255.0M | $257.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $248.3M | $261.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $240.1M | $236.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $250.3M | $223.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $225.3M | $221.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $209.2M | $225.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $213.0M | $222.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $26.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-3.5M | $18.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.6M | $46.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.5M | $38.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.9M | $32.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.6M | $-66.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.2M | $34.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.8M | $34.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 67.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 67.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 69.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 69.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 67.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 68.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 66.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 23.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 67.5% | 16.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 68.1% | 28.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 69.4% | 26.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 66.0% | 25.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 65.8% | -19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 67.9% | 28.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 66.4% | 27.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.4% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 16.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.3% | 14.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | -30.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.4% | 15.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 15.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.17 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.02 | $0.12 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.05 | $0.29 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.09 | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.12 | $0.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.09 | $-0.39 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.07 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.05 | $0.20 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.7M | $46.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.3B | $34.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.7B | $272.0M |
| Total Assets | $8.9B | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.71× | 0.13× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $46.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.7M | $65.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $196.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $416.8M | $147.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | $108.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.3M | $77.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $76.1M | $206.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.0M | $122.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $34.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6B | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $272.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.7B | $293.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7B | $403.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | $352.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | $299.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8B | $265.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.4B | $486.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5B | $438.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.8B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.8B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.7B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.71× | 3.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.70× | 2.55× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.73× | 2.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.63× | 3.45× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.64× | 3.90× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.60× | 2.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.58× | 2.36× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $402.3M | $40.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $135.0M | $9.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 53.0% | 4.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 104.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.53× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $104.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $40.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $402.3M | $40.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $120.5M | $77.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.6M | $75.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.8M | $63.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $400.2M | $40.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $117.4M | $108.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $125.5M | $40.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $135.0M | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $49.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $40.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $41.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $147.5M | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $85.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $26.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 53.0% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 18.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 65.5% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 104.8% | 13.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 112.2% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.53× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.12× | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.03× | 1.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.46× | 1.95× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.14× | 1.95× | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.35× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.48× | 3.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.01× | 1.17× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CUZ
| Rental Properties | $253.3M | 99% |
| Fee And Other Revenue | $1.7M | 1% |
| Other | $1.2M | 0% |
VRRM
| Government Solutions segment generated total | $105.3M | 47% |
| Commercial Services segment generated total | $97.8M | 44% |
| Parking Solutions segment generated total | $20.4M | 9% |
