vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. (LOCO) and VERRA MOBILITY Corp (VRRM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
VERRA MOBILITY Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($223.6M vs $126.2M, roughly 1.8× El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc.). VERRA MOBILITY Corp runs the higher net margin — 12.0% vs 6.5%, a 5.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.9% vs 0.1%). Over the past eight quarters, El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (1.6% CAGR vs 0.3%).
El Pollo Loco, Inc., is a restaurant chain based in the United States, specializing in Mexican-style grilled chicken. Restaurant service consists of dine-in and take-out, with some locations offering drive-through options. The company is headquartered in Costa Mesa, California, and operates about 500 company-owned and franchised restaurants in the Southwestern United States.
Verra Mobility Corp is a leading global smart mobility technology solution provider. It delivers toll management, parking and traffic compliance enforcement, connected vehicle services, and fleet management tools, serving government transport agencies, rental car operators, commercial fleet owners, and automotive partners across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific.
LOCO vs VRRM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $126.2M | $223.6M |
| Net Profit | $8.2M | $26.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 9.7% | 23.2% |
| Net Margin | 6.5% | 12.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.9% | 0.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 48.8% | -17.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.27 | $0.17 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $126.2M | $223.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $123.5M | $257.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $121.5M | $261.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $125.8M | $236.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.2M | $223.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $114.3M | $221.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $120.4M | $225.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $122.2M | $222.4M |
| Q1 26 | $8.2M | $26.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.5M | $18.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.4M | $46.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1M | $38.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5M | $32.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.0M | $-66.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.2M | $34.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | $34.2M |
| Q1 26 | 9.7% | 23.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.3% | 16.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.4% | 28.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 26.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.5% | 25.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.9% | -19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 28.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.1% | 27.5% |
| Q1 26 | 6.5% | 12.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.6% | 16.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.6% | 14.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.2% | -30.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.1% | 15.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.2% | 15.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.27 | $0.17 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.22 | $0.12 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.25 | $0.29 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.24 | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.19 | $0.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.21 | $-0.39 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.21 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.25 | $0.20 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.9M | $46.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $34.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $302.5M | $272.0M |
| Total Assets | $609.1M | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.13× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $3.9M | $46.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.2M | $65.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.9M | $196.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.0M | $147.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.3M | $108.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $77.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | $206.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.5M | $122.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $34.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $51.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $69.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $73.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $76.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.0M | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | $302.5M | $272.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $291.1M | $293.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $282.9M | $403.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $274.2M | $352.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $265.7M | $299.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $260.7M | $265.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $255.2M | $486.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $248.6M | $438.6M |
| Q1 26 | $609.1M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $606.6M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $602.7M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $596.8M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $590.5M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $592.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $590.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $593.8M | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.18× | 3.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.22× | 2.55× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.25× | 2.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.27× | 3.45× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.27× | 3.90× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.30× | 2.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.35× | 2.36× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $40.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $9.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 4.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.53× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $104.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $40.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | $40.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.3M | $77.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.1M | $75.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7M | $63.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.6M | $40.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.0M | $108.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.0M | $40.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.1M | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.9M | $49.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.1M | $40.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3M | $41.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1M | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1M | $85.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.4M | $26.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.1% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.2% | 18.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 17.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | 18.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.6% | 37.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.5% | 11.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | 13.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.4% | 11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.0% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 9.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | 6.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.53× | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.13× | 2.12× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.08× | 1.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.99× | 1.95× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.86× | 1.95× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.95× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.11× | 3.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.22× | 1.17× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LOCO
Segment breakdown not available.
VRRM
| Government Solutions segment generated total | $105.3M | 47% |
| Commercial Services segment generated total | $97.8M | 44% |
| Parking Solutions segment generated total | $20.4M | 9% |
