vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. (CVGI) and AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. (FOLD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($185.2M vs $154.8M, roughly 1.2× Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.). On growth, AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.7% vs -5.2%). AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($16.0M vs $8.7M). Over the past eight quarters, AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (29.5% CAGR vs -10.8%).
WABCO Holdings, Inc. was a U.S.-based provider of electronic braking, stability, suspension and transmission automation systems for heavy-duty commercial vehicles. In 2007, the Vehicle Control Systems was spun off as WABCO Holdings Inc., an American provider of electronic braking, stability, suspension and transmission automation systems for heavy-duty commercial vehicles. Their products are present in many commercial vehicles such as trucks, buses, trailers and off-highway vehicles but they ...
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. is a public American biopharmaceutical company based in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The company went public in 2007 under the Nasdaq trading symbol FOLD. This followed a 2006 planned offering and subsequent withdrawal, which would have established the trading symbol as AMTX Prior to their IPO, Amicus was funded by a variety of venture capital firms including Radius Ventures, Canaan Partners and New Enterprise Associates.
CVGI vs FOLD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $154.8M | $185.2M |
| Net Profit | — | $1.7M |
| Gross Margin | 9.7% | 85.7% |
| Operating Margin | -1.2% | 8.6% |
| Net Margin | — | 0.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.2% | 23.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -88.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $154.8M | $185.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $152.5M | $169.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $172.0M | $154.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $169.8M | $125.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $163.3M | $149.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $171.8M | $141.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $193.7M | $126.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $194.6M | $110.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.1M | $17.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.8M | $-24.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.3M | $-21.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5M | $-6.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | $-15.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9M | $-48.4M |
| Q4 25 | 9.7% | 85.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.5% | 88.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.4% | 90.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.5% | 90.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 90.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.6% | 90.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.6% | 91.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.9% | 87.7% |
| Q4 25 | -1.2% | 8.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.7% | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | -6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | -6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.2% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.6% | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | 11.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.3% | -25.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.6% | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | -15.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.5% | -17.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.5% | -4.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.8% | -12.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | -43.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.05 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.09 | $-0.16 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $293.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $104.9M | $392.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $133.4M | $274.2M |
| Total Assets | $391.7M | $949.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.79× | 1.43× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $293.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $263.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $231.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $250.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $249.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $249.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $260.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $239.6M |
| Q4 25 | $104.9M | $392.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.2M | $392.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.2M | $391.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $117.4M | $390.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $135.5M | $390.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $128.8M | $389.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $142.0M | $388.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $155.7M | $388.4M |
| Q4 25 | $133.4M | $274.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $136.5M | $230.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $142.6M | $204.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $136.7M | $193.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $135.6M | $194.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $179.3M | $178.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $169.6M | $132.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $175.5M | $130.7M |
| Q4 25 | $391.7M | $949.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $400.3M | $868.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $429.8M | $815.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $419.8M | $789.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $424.6M | $785.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $495.3M | $786.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $503.2M | $749.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $509.2M | $721.8M |
| Q4 25 | 0.79× | 1.43× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.79× | 1.70× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.83× | 1.92× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.86× | 2.02× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.00× | 2.01× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.72× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.84× | 2.93× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.89× | 2.97× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $12.3M | $16.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $8.7M | $16.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.6% | 8.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.3% | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 9.62× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $34.0M | $29.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $12.3M | $16.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.7M | $35.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.9M | $-26.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.2M | $7.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-26.6M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-17.1M | $-23.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.6M | $22.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.4M | $-29.7M |
| Q4 25 | $8.7M | $16.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.5M | $35.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.4M | $-28.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.4M | $7.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-30.6M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-20.3M | $-23.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.4M | $21.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.4M | $-31.5M |
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | 8.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.3% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.1% | -18.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.7% | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -18.7% | -2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.8% | -16.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | 17.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.8% | -28.5% |
| Q4 25 | 2.3% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.62× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.06× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.27× | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.79× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.80× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CVGI
| Global Seating | $70.7M | 46% |
| Global Electrical Systems | $49.7M | 32% |
| Trim Systems And Components | $34.4M | 22% |
FOLD
| Other | $105.8M | 57% |
| Galafold | $64.8M | 35% |
| Pombiliti Opfolda | $14.6M | 8% |
