vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. (CVGI) and MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP (MATW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($284.8M vs $154.8M, roughly 1.8× Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.). On growth, Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-5.2% vs -29.1%). Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($8.7M vs $-57.2M).
WABCO Holdings, Inc. was a U.S.-based provider of electronic braking, stability, suspension and transmission automation systems for heavy-duty commercial vehicles. In 2007, the Vehicle Control Systems was spun off as WABCO Holdings Inc., an American provider of electronic braking, stability, suspension and transmission automation systems for heavy-duty commercial vehicles. Their products are present in many commercial vehicles such as trucks, buses, trailers and off-highway vehicles but they ...
Matthews Aurora Funeral Solutions is one of the largest manufacturers of caskets and funerary urns in the United States, selling over 38% of the country's caskets as of 2005. The Aurora, Indiana–based company is a subsidiary of Pittsburgh-based Matthews International. The company makes both wooden and metal caskets and urns for holding cremated remains. It also provides supplies and consulting services for funeral homes.
CVGI vs MATW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $154.8M | $284.8M |
| Net Profit | — | $43.6M |
| Gross Margin | 9.7% | 35.0% |
| Operating Margin | -1.2% | 34.2% |
| Net Margin | — | 15.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.2% | -29.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 1356.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $154.8M | $284.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $152.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $172.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $169.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $163.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $171.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $193.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $194.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $43.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.7% | 35.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | -1.2% | 34.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 15.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.39 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.05 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.09 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $31.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $104.9M | $529.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $133.4M | $543.2M |
| Total Assets | $391.7M | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.79× | 0.98× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $31.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $104.9M | $529.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $117.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $135.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $128.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $142.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $155.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $133.4M | $543.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $136.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $142.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $136.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $135.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $179.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $169.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $175.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $391.7M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $400.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $429.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $419.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $424.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $495.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $503.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $509.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.79× | 0.98× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.79× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.83× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.86× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.84× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.89× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $12.3M | $-52.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $8.7M | $-57.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.6% | -20.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.3% | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -1.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $34.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $12.3M | $-52.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-26.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-17.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $8.7M | $-57.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-30.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-20.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | -20.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -18.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.3% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -1.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.79× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.80× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CVGI
| Global Seating | $70.7M | 46% |
| Global Electrical Systems | $49.7M | 32% |
| Trim Systems And Components | $34.4M | 22% |
MATW
Segment breakdown not available.
