vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. (CVGI) and Shutterstock, Inc. (SSTK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Shutterstock, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($220.2M vs $154.8M, roughly 1.4× Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.). On growth, Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-5.2% vs -12.0%). Shutterstock, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($25.9M vs $8.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Shutterstock, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (1.4% CAGR vs -10.8%).
WABCO Holdings, Inc. was a U.S.-based provider of electronic braking, stability, suspension and transmission automation systems for heavy-duty commercial vehicles. In 2007, the Vehicle Control Systems was spun off as WABCO Holdings Inc., an American provider of electronic braking, stability, suspension and transmission automation systems for heavy-duty commercial vehicles. Their products are present in many commercial vehicles such as trucks, buses, trailers and off-highway vehicles but they ...
Shutterstock, Inc. is an American provider of stock photography, stock footage, stock music, and editing tools; it is headquartered in New York. Founded in 2002 by programmer and photographer Jon Oringer, Shutterstock maintains a library of around 200 million royalty-free stock photos, vector graphics, and illustrations, with around 10 million video clips and music tracks available for licensing. Originally a subscription site only, Shutterstock expanded beyond subscriptions into à la carte p...
CVGI vs SSTK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $154.8M | $220.2M |
| Net Profit | — | $-16.0M |
| Gross Margin | 9.7% | 55.8% |
| Operating Margin | -1.2% | -1.1% |
| Net Margin | — | -7.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.2% | -12.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -1021.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.47 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $154.8M | $220.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $152.5M | $260.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $172.0M | $267.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $169.8M | $242.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $163.3M | $250.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $171.8M | $250.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $193.7M | $220.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $194.6M | $214.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-16.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.1M | $13.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.8M | $29.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.3M | $18.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5M | $17.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9M | $16.1M |
| Q4 25 | 9.7% | 55.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.5% | 60.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.4% | 60.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.5% | 58.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 55.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.6% | 58.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.6% | 58.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.9% | 58.8% |
| Q4 25 | -1.2% | -1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.7% | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | 13.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.2% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.6% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.3% | 7.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | -7.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.6% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | 11.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.5% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.5% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.8% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 7.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.47 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.82 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.53 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.50 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.05 | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.09 | $0.45 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $178.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $104.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $133.4M | $581.0M |
| Total Assets | $391.7M | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.79× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $178.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $165.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $116.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $112.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $111.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $131.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $74.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $71.8M |
| Q4 25 | $104.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $117.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $135.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $128.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $142.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $155.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $133.4M | $581.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $136.5M | $594.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $142.6M | $586.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $136.7M | $547.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $135.6M | $518.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $179.3M | $522.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $169.6M | $520.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $175.5M | $541.3M |
| Q4 25 | $391.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $400.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $429.8M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $419.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $424.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $495.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $503.2M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $509.2M | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | 0.79× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.79× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.83× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.86× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.84× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.89× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $12.3M | $36.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $8.7M | $25.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.6% | 11.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.3% | 4.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $34.0M | $123.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $12.3M | $36.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.7M | $78.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.9M | $26.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.2M | $25.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-26.6M | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-17.1M | $-11.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.6M | $28.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.4M | $8.3M |
| Q4 25 | $8.7M | $25.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.5M | $68.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.4M | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.4M | $14.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-30.6M | $-952.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-20.3M | $-26.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.4M | $18.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.4M | $-6.2M |
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.3% | 26.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.1% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.7% | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -18.7% | -0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.8% | -10.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.8% | -2.9% |
| Q4 25 | 2.3% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 6.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.86× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.35× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.79× | -0.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.71× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.80× | 0.51× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CVGI
| Global Seating | $70.7M | 46% |
| Global Electrical Systems | $49.7M | 32% |
| Trim Systems And Components | $34.4M | 22% |
SSTK
Segment breakdown not available.