vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. (CVGI) and USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC (USNA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($250.2M vs $154.8M, roughly 1.6× Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.). On growth, USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-3.0% vs -5.2%). Over the past eight quarters, USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC's revenue compounded faster (11.8% CAGR vs -10.8%).
WABCO Holdings, Inc. was a U.S.-based provider of electronic braking, stability, suspension and transmission automation systems for heavy-duty commercial vehicles. In 2007, the Vehicle Control Systems was spun off as WABCO Holdings Inc., an American provider of electronic braking, stability, suspension and transmission automation systems for heavy-duty commercial vehicles. Their products are present in many commercial vehicles such as trucks, buses, trailers and off-highway vehicles but they ...
Usana Health Sciences, Inc., or USANA, is an American multi-level marketing company based in Salt Lake City, Utah. As of 2021, Usana was the 14th largest direct-selling company in the world by revenue. The company manufactures most of its nutritional products, dietary supplements, and skincare products at a Salt Lake City facility. Its products are sold in 24 countries via a network of independent distributors.
CVGI vs USNA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2027
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $154.8M | $250.2M |
| Net Profit | — | $7.5M |
| Gross Margin | 9.7% | 76.2% |
| Operating Margin | -1.2% | 5.5% |
| Net Margin | — | 3.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.2% | -3.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -20.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.41 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $250.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $154.8M | $226.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $152.5M | $213.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $172.0M | $235.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $169.8M | $249.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $163.3M | $213.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $171.8M | $200.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $193.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $180.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.1M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.8M | $9.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.3M | $9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5M | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 76.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.7% | 78.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.5% | 77.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.4% | 78.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.5% | 79.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 82.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.6% | 80.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.7% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | 7.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.2% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.6% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.6% | -3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.5% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.5% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.41 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.52 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.56 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.05 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $162.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $104.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $133.4M | — |
| Total Assets | $391.7M | $739.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.79× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $162.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $158.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $145.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $151.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $179.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $181.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $364.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $104.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $117.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $135.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $128.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $142.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $133.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $136.5M | $528.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $142.6M | $531.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $136.7M | $529.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $135.6M | $532.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $179.3M | $533.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $169.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $739.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $391.7M | $742.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $400.3M | $726.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $429.8M | $734.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $419.8M | $746.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $424.6M | $748.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $495.3M | $671.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $503.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.79× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.79× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.83× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.86× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.84× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $12.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $8.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $34.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.7M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.9M | $12.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.2M | $15.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-26.6M | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-17.1M | $29.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.5M | $-5.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.4M | $7.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.4M | $12.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-30.6M | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-20.3M | $27.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.3% | -2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.1% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.7% | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -18.7% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.8% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.27× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.79× | 2.78× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CVGI
| Global Seating | $70.7M | 46% |
| Global Electrical Systems | $49.7M | 32% |
| Trim Systems And Components | $34.4M | 22% |
USNA
Segment breakdown not available.