vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CaliberCos Inc. (CWD) and ELECTRO SENSORS INC (ELSE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CaliberCos Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.1M vs $2.8M, roughly 1.5× ELECTRO SENSORS INC). ELECTRO SENSORS INC runs the higher net margin — 3.7% vs -188.3%, a 192.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ELECTRO SENSORS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.8% vs -52.5%). Over the past eight quarters, ELECTRO SENSORS INC's revenue compounded faster (10.8% CAGR vs -57.6%).
CaliberCos Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered alternative asset management firm focused primarily on real estate investments. It offers a diverse suite of investment vehicles covering commercial, residential, and industrial real estate assets, serving institutional investors, high-net-worth individuals, and retail clients across North America. It also delivers asset management, property operation, and value-add real estate development services to support consistent long-term returns for investors.
Polar Electro Oy is a Finnish manufacturer of sports training computers, particularly known for developing the world's first wireless heart rate monitor.
CWD vs ELSE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.1M | $2.8M |
| Net Profit | $-7.7M | $103.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 50.3% |
| Operating Margin | -196.6% | -0.3% |
| Net Margin | -188.3% | 3.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -52.5% | 14.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 32.2% | -48.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.95 | $0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.1M | $2.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1M | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3M | $2.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.7M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.2M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.0M | $2.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-7.7M | $103.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.4M | $208.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.3M | $59.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.4M | $-64.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-11.4M | $201.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $146.0K | $238.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.7M | $-4.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.8M | $11.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 50.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 53.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 51.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 48.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 49.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 50.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 47.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 48.1% |
| Q4 25 | -196.6% | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -129.6% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -112.4% | -0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -62.7% | -7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -236.8% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -65.0% | -4.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -22.9% | -4.5% |
| Q4 25 | -188.3% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -120.2% | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -104.5% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -60.7% | -2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -247.6% | 8.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | 9.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -57.8% | -0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -16.6% | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | $1.95 | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.65 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.15 | $0.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.85 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-10.15 | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.12 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.34 | $0.00 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.53 | $0.00 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.9M | $10.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.3M | $14.8M |
| Total Assets | $135.4M | $15.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.9M | $10.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.9M | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $683.0K | $10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $10.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3M | $10.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6M | $10.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8M | $9.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1M | $10.1M |
| Q4 25 | $1.3M | $14.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2M | $14.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.9M | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-15.8M | $14.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-12.6M | $14.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.8M | $14.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.7M | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-745.0K | $13.8M |
| Q4 25 | $135.4M | $15.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.6M | $15.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.3M | $15.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.6M | $15.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $105.5M | $14.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $158.6M | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $195.2M | $14.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $201.5M | $14.5M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-12.1M | $20.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-12.1M | $20.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.6M | $395.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.2M | $277.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.7M | $-30.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $555.0K | $-277.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-74.0K | $362.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4M | $-158.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.5M | $202.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $389.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-298.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $358.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-184.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -12.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 14.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -8.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.90× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.38× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.51× | 1.52× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 18.36× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
