vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CaliberCos Inc. (CWD) and EON Resources Inc. (EONR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
EON Resources Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.4M vs $4.1M, roughly 1.1× CaliberCos Inc.). EON Resources Inc. runs the higher net margin — 128.9% vs -188.3%, a 317.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, EON Resources Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-40.7% vs -52.5%). Over the past eight quarters, EON Resources Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-9.1% CAGR vs -57.6%).
CaliberCos Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered alternative asset management firm focused primarily on real estate investments. It offers a diverse suite of investment vehicles covering commercial, residential, and industrial real estate assets, serving institutional investors, high-net-worth individuals, and retail clients across North America. It also delivers asset management, property operation, and value-add real estate development services to support consistent long-term returns for investors.
E.ON SE is a European multinational electric utility company based in Essen, Germany. It operates as one of the world's largest investor-owned electric utility service providers. The name originates from the Latin word aeon, derived from the Greek αἰών aion, which means age or "infinity", with the period being added to create secondary meanings of "energy" (E) and "illumination" (ON). The company is a component of the Euro Stoxx 50 stock market index, DAX stock index and a member of the Dow J...
CWD vs EONR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.1M | $4.4M |
| Net Profit | $-7.7M | $5.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -196.6% | -40.4% |
| Net Margin | -188.3% | 128.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -52.5% | -40.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 32.2% | 316.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.95 | $0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6M | $4.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1M | $4.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3M | $4.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.7M | $3.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3M | $7.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.2M | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.0M | $3.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-7.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.4M | $5.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.3M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.4M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-11.4M | $-5.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $146.0K | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.7M | $-637.8K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.8M | $-4.7M |
| Q4 25 | -196.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -129.6% | -40.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -112.4% | -4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -62.7% | -5.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -236.8% | -87.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 27.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -65.0% | -6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -22.9% | -68.9% |
| Q4 25 | -188.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -120.2% | 128.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -104.5% | -28.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -60.7% | -38.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -247.6% | -137.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -57.8% | -12.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -16.6% | -143.0% |
| Q4 25 | $1.95 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.65 | $0.10 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.15 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.85 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-10.15 | $-0.62 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.12 | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.34 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.53 | $-0.90 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.9M | $875.6K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.3M | $60.9M |
| Total Assets | $135.4M | $89.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.09× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.9M | $875.6K | ||
| Q2 25 | $683.0K | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $3.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1M | $3.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $43.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $43.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $44.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $44.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $44.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $45.5M |
| Q4 25 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2M | $60.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.9M | $17.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-15.8M | $11.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-12.6M | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.8M | $-6.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.7M | $-6.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-745.0K | $-7.4M |
| Q4 25 | $135.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.6M | $89.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.3M | $106.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.6M | $103.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $105.5M | $102.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $158.6M | $103.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $195.2M | $101.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $201.5M | $100.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.09× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.55× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.82× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-12.1M | $-7.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -1.37× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-12.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.6M | $-7.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.2M | $30.4K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.7M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $555.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-74.0K | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4M | $1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.5M | $1.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.37× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.51× | 0.81× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
