vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ClearSign Technologies Corp (CLIR) and CaliberCos Inc. (CWD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CaliberCos Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.1M vs $3.7M, roughly 1.1× ClearSign Technologies Corp). ClearSign Technologies Corp runs the higher net margin — -8.5% vs -188.3%, a 179.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ClearSign Technologies Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (522.2% vs -52.5%). Over the past eight quarters, ClearSign Technologies Corp's revenue compounded faster (82.5% CAGR vs -57.6%).
ClearSign Technologies Corporation (ClearSign) is a United States-based company that develops emission-control technology.
CaliberCos Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered alternative asset management firm focused primarily on real estate investments. It offers a diverse suite of investment vehicles covering commercial, residential, and industrial real estate assets, serving institutional investors, high-net-worth individuals, and retail clients across North America. It also delivers asset management, property operation, and value-add real estate development services to support consistent long-term returns for investors.
CLIR vs CWD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.7M | $4.1M |
| Net Profit | $-311.0K | $-7.7M |
| Gross Margin | 21.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -22.5% | -196.6% |
| Net Margin | -8.5% | -188.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 522.2% | -52.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 73.3% | 32.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | $1.95 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $3.7M | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0M | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $133.0K | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $401.0K | $7.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $590.0K | $8.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9M | $11.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.0K | $8.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1M | $23.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-311.0K | $-7.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4M | $-4.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.7M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.1M | $-4.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.2M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.2M | $146.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.9M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.1M | $-3.8M |
| Q4 25 | 21.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 93.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 39.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | -22.5% | -196.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -170.1% | -129.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1382.0% | -112.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -562.8% | -62.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -282.4% | -236.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -77.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4748.9% | -65.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -113.6% | -22.9% |
| Q4 25 | -8.5% | -188.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -138.9% | -120.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1263.2% | -104.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -517.7% | -60.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -197.3% | -247.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -62.1% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4160.0% | -57.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -100.5% | -16.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.06 | $1.95 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.26 | $-1.65 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.30 | $-4.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.37 | $-3.85 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.18 | $-10.15 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.20 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.40 | $-4.34 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.30 | $-3.53 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $9.2M | $2.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.5M | $1.3M |
| Total Assets | $12.2M | $135.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $9.2M | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5M | $10.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3M | $683.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.9M | $1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.0M | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.0M | $1.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.6M | $2.1M |
| Q4 25 | $9.5M | $1.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.1M | $4.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.4M | $-19.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.0M | $-15.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.8M | $-12.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.8M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.9M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $-745.0K |
| Q4 25 | $12.2M | $135.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.7M | $82.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.2M | $59.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.5M | $103.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.3M | $105.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.1M | $158.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.8M | $195.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.6M | $201.5M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.3M | $-12.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.3M | $-12.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.8M | $-4.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-511.0K | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.1M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-415.0K | $555.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.4M | $-74.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.5M | $1.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.0M | $-1.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -278.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.51× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
