vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CaliberCos Inc. (CWD) and Twin Vee PowerCats, Co. (VEEE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CaliberCos Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.1M vs $3.0M, roughly 1.4× Twin Vee PowerCats, Co.). Twin Vee PowerCats, Co. runs the higher net margin — -85.6% vs -188.3%, a 102.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Twin Vee PowerCats, Co. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (60.4% vs -52.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Twin Vee PowerCats, Co.'s revenue compounded faster (-24.3% CAGR vs -57.6%).
CaliberCos Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered alternative asset management firm focused primarily on real estate investments. It offers a diverse suite of investment vehicles covering commercial, residential, and industrial real estate assets, serving institutional investors, high-net-worth individuals, and retail clients across North America. It also delivers asset management, property operation, and value-add real estate development services to support consistent long-term returns for investors.
Twin Vee PowerCats Co. is a leading manufacturer of high-performance recreational power catamaran boats. The company offers a diverse lineup of catamaran models suited for leisure cruising, fishing, water sports, and commercial marine use, serving customers primarily across North America, with a growing distribution network in global coastal markets.
CWD vs VEEE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.1M | $3.0M |
| Net Profit | $-7.7M | $-2.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 3.7% |
| Operating Margin | -196.6% | -87.7% |
| Net Margin | -188.3% | -85.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -52.5% | 60.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 32.2% | -119.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.95 | $-1.19 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.1M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6M | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1M | $4.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3M | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.7M | $1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3M | $2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.2M | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.0M | $5.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-7.7M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.4M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.3M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.4M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-11.4M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $146.0K | $-3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.7M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.8M | $-2.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -57.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -5.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | -196.6% | -87.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -129.6% | -81.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -112.4% | -35.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -62.7% | -46.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -236.8% | -224.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | -107.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -65.0% | -107.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -22.9% | -48.2% |
| Q4 25 | -188.3% | -85.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -120.2% | -80.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -104.5% | -34.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -60.7% | -44.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -247.6% | -62.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | -103.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -57.8% | -104.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -16.6% | -44.3% |
| Q4 25 | $1.95 | $-1.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.65 | $-1.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.15 | $-0.87 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.85 | $-1.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-10.15 | $-3.51 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.12 | $-2.64 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.34 | $-3.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.53 | $-1.77 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.9M | $1.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $499.9K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.3M | $13.5M |
| Total Assets | $135.4M | $16.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.04× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.9M | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.9M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $683.0K | $6.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3M | $7.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8M | $14.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1M | $17.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $499.9K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $499.9K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $499.9K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $499.9K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $499.9K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $499.9K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $499.9K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $499.9K |
| Q4 25 | $1.3M | $13.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2M | $15.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.9M | $18.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-15.8M | $17.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-12.6M | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.8M | $17.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.7M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-745.0K | $22.3M |
| Q4 25 | $135.4M | $16.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.6M | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.3M | $22.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.6M | $23.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $105.5M | $25.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $158.6M | $30.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $195.2M | $33.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $201.5M | $36.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.02× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-12.1M | $-1.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-1.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -62.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-9.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-12.1M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.6M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.2M | $-745.6K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.7M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $555.0K | $-2.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-74.0K | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4M | $-482.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.5M | $-1.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-3.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-3.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | -62.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -91.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -30.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -71.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -192.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -128.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -51.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -70.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 22.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 68.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 37.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.51× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
