vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Danaos Corp (DAC) and International General Insurance Holdings Ltd. (IGIC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
International General Insurance Holdings Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($403.8M vs $262.2M, roughly 1.5× Danaos Corp). Danaos Corp runs the higher net margin — 49.9% vs 26.0%, a 23.9% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Danaos Corporation is a leading global containership ownership and management firm. It operates a large fleet of modern container vessels, providing long-term charter services to top international container liner operators across major global trade routes, supporting the efficiency and reliability of global supply chains.
China Taiping Insurance Holdings Company Limited (CTIH) formerly China Insurance International Holdings Company Limited (CIIH), is a Chinese insurance conglomerate. The company has strong Chinese Central Government background despite being incorporated in Hong Kong. It is considered as a red chip company.
DAC vs IGIC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $262.2M | $403.8M |
| Net Profit | $130.9M | $105.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 47.9% | — |
| Net Margin | 49.9% | 26.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.4% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -7.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $7.12 | $2.31 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $403.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $262.2M | $261.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $369.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $246.3M | $265.8M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $293.0M | ||
| Q2 23 | $241.5M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $250.9M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $105.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $130.9M | $61.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-134.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $141.2M | $70.7M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-103.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | $147.0M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $8.2M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 47.9% | 24.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.8% | -73.3% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 61.1% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 62.5% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 26.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.9% | 23.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -36.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 57.3% | 26.6% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -35.4% | ||
| Q2 23 | 60.9% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 3.3% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $2.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.12 | $1.36 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.82 | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.23 | $1.55 | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $7.32 | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $0.40 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $654.1M | $244.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.6B | $654.8M |
| Total Assets | $4.5B | $2.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $244.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $654.1M | $164.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $219.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $471.7M | $237.3M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $122.2M | ||
| Q2 23 | $367.9M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $319.6M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $654.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $662.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $540.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $588.2M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $411.0M | ||
| Q2 23 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $2.4B | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 23 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $3.7B | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
