vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dingdong (Cayman) Ltd (DDL) and Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dingdong (Cayman) Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($115.3M vs $78.2M, roughly 1.5× Ellington Financial Inc.). Ellington Financial Inc. runs the higher net margin — 28.9% vs 5.8%, a 23.1% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Dingdong (Cayman) Ltd operates a leading on-demand grocery e-commerce platform primarily serving the Chinese market. It provides fresh produce, daily necessities, ready-to-eat meals, and household staples to urban consumers, leveraging optimized supply chains and localized logistics networks to offer fast, reliable 30-minute delivery services, prioritizing product freshness and user convenience.
Ellington Management Group is an American hedge fund firm. As of June 2019, the firm was reportedly managing $8.5 billion in structured products and other credit instruments.
DDL vs EFC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2022 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $115.3M | $78.2M |
| Net Profit | $6.7M | $22.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 5.3% | 7.4% |
| Net Margin | 5.8% | 28.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 8.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -26.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.02 | $0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $78.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $82.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $92.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $82.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $72.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $67.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $91.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $75.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $22.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $29.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $42.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $31.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $30.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $16.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $52.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $26.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 31.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 37.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 52.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 42.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 28.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 35.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 46.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 38.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 42.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 57.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 35.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.29 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.45 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.62 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.32 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $113.7M | $201.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $135.8K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.5M | $1.8B |
| Total Assets | $178.3M | $19.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.03× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $201.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $184.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $211.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $203.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $192.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $217.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $198.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $187.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | $19.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $17.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $17.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $16.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $16.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $16.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $15.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $15.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-925.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -40.92× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-925.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-290.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-210.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-126.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-430.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-141.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-88.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-59.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | -40.92× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -9.84× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -4.90× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.99× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -14.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -8.76× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1.69× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -2.21× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
