vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DIVERSIFIED HEALTHCARE TRUST (DHC) and Kontoor Brands, Inc. (KTB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Kontoor Brands, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($613.3M vs $379.6M, roughly 1.6× DIVERSIFIED HEALTHCARE TRUST). Kontoor Brands, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 15.1% vs -5.6%, a 20.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kontoor Brands, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (45.0% vs -0.0%). Over the past eight quarters, DIVERSIFIED HEALTHCARE TRUST's revenue compounded faster (1.2% CAGR vs -1.4%).
GE Healthcare Technologies, Inc. is an American health technology company based in Chicago, Illinois. The company, which stylizes its own name as GE HealthCare, operates four divisions: Medical imaging, which includes molecular imaging, computed tomography, magnetic resonance, women’s health screening and X-ray systems; Ultrasound; Patient Care Solutions, which is focused on remote patient monitoring, anesthesia and respiratory care, diagnostic cardiology, and infant care; and Pharmaceutical ...
Kontoor Brands is an American clothing company. It was a spin off from the VF Corporation in May 2019, and markets clothing under the Lee, Wrangler and Helly Hansen brand names.
DHC vs KTB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $379.6M | $613.3M |
| Net Profit | $-21.2M | $92.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 53.7% |
| Operating Margin | -12.6% | 14.7% |
| Net Margin | -5.6% | 15.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.0% | 45.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 75.7% | 116.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.09 | $1.65 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $613.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $379.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $388.7M | $853.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $382.7M | $658.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $386.9M | $622.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $379.6M | $699.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $373.6M | $670.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $371.4M | $606.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $92.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-21.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-164.0M | $36.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-91.6M | $73.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.0M | $42.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-87.4M | $64.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-98.7M | $70.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-97.9M | $51.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 53.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 46.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 47.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 44.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 44.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 14.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | -12.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -43.4% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -24.5% | 11.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | 11.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -26.1% | 12.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -26.5% | 14.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -23.0% | 12.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -5.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -42.2% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.9% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.3% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -23.0% | 9.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -26.4% | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.3% | 8.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.65 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.68 | $0.66 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.38 | $1.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.04 | $0.76 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.37 | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.41 | $1.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.41 | $0.92 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $105.4M | $56.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.4B | $1.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.7B | $618.9M |
| Total Assets | $4.4B | $2.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.47× | 1.85× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $56.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $105.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $201.4M | $82.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $141.8M | $107.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $302.6M | $356.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $144.6M | $334.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $256.5M | $269.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $265.6M | $224.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $735.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $740.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $745.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $749.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $618.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $529.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $498.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $426.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $400.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $356.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $367.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.85× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.47× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.53× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.74× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.72× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.56× | 1.85× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.04× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-19.6M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-166.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -43.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 38.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-280.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-19.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-49.3M | $64.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.0M | $25.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.2M | $77.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $112.2M | $82.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.1M | $133.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.3M | $96.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-166.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-89.8M | $55.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $22.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-42.9M | $74.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-89.5M | $75.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-26.1M | $129.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3M | $92.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -43.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.1% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.9% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -11.1% | 12.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -23.6% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.0% | 19.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 15.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.4% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.9% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.2% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.1% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.6% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.0% | 0.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.74× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.81× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.28× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.89× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.86× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DHC
| Senior Housing Operating Portfolio Segment | $323.4M | 85% |
| Rental Income | $56.2M | 15% |
KTB
| Wrangler U.S | $373.7M | 61% |
| Helly Hansen International | $129.3M | 21% |
| Wrangler International | $62.1M | 10% |
| Helly Hansen U.S | $36.2M | 6% |
| Global Other | $12.0M | 2% |
