vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Digital Realty (DLR) and Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Digital Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.6B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.4× Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc.). Digital Realty runs the higher net margin — 6.0% vs 3.4%, a 2.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Digital Realty posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.1% vs -0.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Digital Realty's revenue compounded faster (9.8% CAGR vs 0.8%).
Digital Realty is a real estate investment trust that owns, operates and invests in carrier-neutral data centers across the world. The company offers data center, colocation, and interconnection services.
Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc., branded as Floor & Decor, is a multi-channel American specialty retailer of hard surface flooring and related accessories that was founded in 2000 and headquartered in Smyrna, Georgia, United States.
DLR vs FND — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.6B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $98.6M | $39.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 44.0% |
| Operating Margin | 6.9% | 4.5% |
| Net Margin | 6.0% | 3.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 16.1% | -0.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -10.3% | -18.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.22 | $0.37 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | $98.6M | $39.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $98.6M | $39.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $67.8M | $57.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $63.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $110.0M | $48.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $189.6M | $47.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.2M | $51.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.2M | $56.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | 44.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 43.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 43.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.3% |
| Q1 26 | 6.9% | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.8% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.2% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.9% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.1% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.8% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 6.3% |
| Q1 26 | 6.0% | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.0% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 69.1% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.2% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.6% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.9% | 5.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.22 | $0.37 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.22 | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.15 | $0.53 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.94 | $0.58 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.27 | $0.45 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.50 | $0.44 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.09 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.20 | $0.52 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.5B | $293.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $22.9B | $2.5B |
| Total Assets | $49.4B | $5.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $3.5B | $293.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | — |
| Q1 26 | $22.9B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $22.9B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.0B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.3B | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.3B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.2B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.5B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | $49.4B | $5.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $49.4B | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $48.7B | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.7B | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.1B | $5.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.3B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $45.3B | $4.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.6B | $4.8B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $109.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.75× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $109.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $719.0M | $124.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $652.9M | $102.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $641.2M | $84.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $399.1M | $71.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $769.5M | $101.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $566.5M | $160.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $573.2M | $194.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $45.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $24.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-10.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $36.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $80.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 10.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.75× | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.29× | 3.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.63× | 1.79× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.62× | 1.33× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.63× | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.06× | 2.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.07× | 3.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.15× | 3.42× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
