vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Digital Realty (DLR) and JBT Marel Corp (JBTM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Digital Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.6B vs $1.0B, roughly 1.6× JBT Marel Corp). Digital Realty runs the higher net margin — 6.0% vs 5.3%, a 0.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, JBT Marel Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (115.6% vs 16.1%). Over the past eight quarters, JBT Marel Corp's revenue compounded faster (60.3% CAGR vs 9.8%).
Digital Realty is a real estate investment trust that owns, operates and invests in carrier-neutral data centers across the world. The company offers data center, colocation, and interconnection services.
JBT Marel Corporation, formerly known as JBT Corporation, or John Bean Technologies Corporation, is a food processing machinery and automated vehicle company. The company was incorporated in 2008 when FMC Technologies divested its non-energy businesses. The company is based in Chicago, Illinois and traces its history back to a company founded in 1884 by John Bean, an orchardist in Los Gatos, California.
DLR vs JBTM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.6B | $1.0B |
| Net Profit | $98.6M | $53.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 34.5% |
| Operating Margin | 6.9% | 7.2% |
| Net Margin | 6.0% | 5.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 16.1% | 115.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -10.3% | 858.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.22 | $1.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $934.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $854.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $467.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $453.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $402.3M |
| Q1 26 | $98.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $98.6M | $53.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $67.8M | $66.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $3.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $110.0M | $-173.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $189.6M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.2M | $38.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.2M | $30.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 34.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 35.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 35.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 34.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 38.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 36.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 35.6% |
| Q1 26 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.8% | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.2% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.9% | -3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.1% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.8% | 10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 6.7% |
| Q1 26 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.0% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 69.1% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | -20.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.2% | -1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.6% | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.9% | 7.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.22 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.22 | $1.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.15 | $1.26 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.94 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.27 | $-3.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.50 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.09 | $1.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.20 | $0.95 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.5B | $167.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $22.9B | $4.5B |
| Total Assets | $49.4B | $8.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.33× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | $167.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $648.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $647.7M |
| Q1 26 | $22.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $22.9B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.0B | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9B | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.3B | $4.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.5B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $49.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $49.4B | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $48.7B | $8.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.7B | $8.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.1B | $8.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.3B | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $45.3B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.6B | $2.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.43× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $117.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $83.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 8.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.21× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $238.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $719.0M | $117.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $652.9M | $87.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $641.2M | $102.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $399.1M | $34.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $769.5M | $128.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $566.5M | $71.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $573.2M | $21.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $83.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $56.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $83.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $14.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $118.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $65.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 25.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 14.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.29× | 2.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.63× | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.62× | 30.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.63× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.06× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.07× | 1.85× | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.15× | 0.70× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
