vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Krispy Kreme, Inc. (DNUT) and USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC (USNA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Krispy Kreme, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($392.4M vs $226.2M, roughly 1.7× USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC). USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC runs the higher net margin — 0.1% vs -7.1%, a 7.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Krispy Kreme, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-2.9% vs -10.0%). Over the past eight quarters, USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC's revenue compounded faster (3.1% CAGR vs -5.9%).
Krispy Kreme, Inc. is an American multinational doughnut company and coffeehouse chain. Krispy Kreme was founded by Vernon Rudolph (1915–1973), who bought a yeast-raised recipe from a New Orleans chef, rented a building in 1937 in what is now historic Old Salem in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, and began selling to local grocery stores. Steady growth preceded an ambitious expansion as a public company in the period 2000 to 2016, which ultimately proved unprofitable. In 2016, the company retur...
Usana Health Sciences, Inc., or USANA, is an American multi-level marketing company based in Salt Lake City, Utah. As of 2021, Usana was the 14th largest direct-selling company in the world by revenue. The company manufactures most of its nutritional products, dietary supplements, and skincare products at a Salt Lake City facility. Its products are sold in 24 countries via a network of independent distributors.
DNUT vs USNA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $392.4M | $226.2M |
| Net Profit | $-27.8M | $180.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 78.2% |
| Operating Margin | -1.9% | 1.7% |
| Net Margin | -7.1% | 0.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.9% | -10.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -23.8% | -74.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.18 | $-0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $392.4M | $226.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $375.3M | $213.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $379.8M | $235.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $375.2M | $249.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $404.0M | $213.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $379.9M | $200.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $438.8M | $212.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $442.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-27.8M | $180.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-19.4M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-435.3M | $9.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.3M | $9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-22.4M | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.6M | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.5M | $10.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 78.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 77.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 78.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 79.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 82.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 80.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 81.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -1.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.4% | 7.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.4% | 6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.8% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.2% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | -7.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.2% | -3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.6% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.9% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.6% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.4% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.3% | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.18 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.55 | $0.52 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.23 | $0.56 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $0.54 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.05 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $42.4M | $158.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $911.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $650.1M | — |
| Total Assets | $2.6B | $742.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.40× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $42.4M | $158.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.7M | $145.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.3M | $151.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.7M | $179.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | $181.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.4M | $364.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.6M | $332.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $911.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $906.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $889.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $935.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $844.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $804.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $895.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $881.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $650.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $670.3M | $528.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $693.6M | $531.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $529.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $532.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $533.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $512.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $742.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $726.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $734.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $746.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $748.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $671.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $631.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.35× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.85× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.79× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.76× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $45.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $27.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-64.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $45.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.3M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-32.5M | $12.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.8M | $15.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.0M | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $29.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.2M | $8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $27.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.5M | $-5.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-60.8M | $7.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-46.7M | $12.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.9M | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-22.9M | $27.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-46.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | -2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.0% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -12.5% | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.7% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.0% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.9% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.9% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.27× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.08× | 2.78× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.77× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.