vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dole plc (DOLE) and Old Dominion (ODFL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dole plc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.3B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.7× Old Dominion). Old Dominion runs the higher net margin — 17.9% vs 0.2%, a 17.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dole plc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.5% vs -2.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Dole plc's revenue compounded faster (3.2% CAGR vs -5.6%).
Dole plc is an Irish-American agricultural multinational corporation headquartered in Dublin, Ireland. The company is among the world's largest producers of fruit and vegetables, operating with 38,500 full-time and seasonal employees who supply some 300 products in 75 countries. Dole reported 2021 revenues of $6.5 billion.
Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL) is an American regional, inter-regional and national less than truckload shipping (LTL) company. In addition to its core LTL services, the company offers expedited, logistics and household moving services.
DOLE vs ODFL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.3B | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $5.1M | $238.3M |
| Gross Margin | 6.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 1.1% | 23.8% |
| Net Margin | 0.2% | 17.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.5% | -2.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -64.6% | -6.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.05 | $1.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $238.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $229.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $270.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.0M | $268.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.9M | $254.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $263.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.4M | $308.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.1M | $322.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 23.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 23.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 25.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | 25.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | 24.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.3% | 27.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 28.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 17.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 17.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 19.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 18.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.8% | 21.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.14 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.05 | $1.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.10 | $1.27 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.41 | $1.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.15 | $1.43 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.84 | $1.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $321.0M | $288.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $40.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $4.4B |
| Total Assets | $4.5B | $5.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.01× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $288.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $120.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $321.0M | $46.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.1M | $24.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $261.0M | $97.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $108.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $266.4M | $74.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $225.8M | $104.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $40.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $20.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $65.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $150.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $40.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $40.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $40.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $40.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $4.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5B | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $5.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5B | $5.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4B | $5.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.01× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $87.4M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $66.5M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 2.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 17.12× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $13.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $310.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $87.4M | $437.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.3M | $285.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-78.8M | $336.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $401.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.0M | $446.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.2M | $387.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $264.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.5M | $343.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.0M | $98.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-131.6M | $248.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $230.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.9M | $203.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.8M | $149.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 20.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 24.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.0% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.3% | 18.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 10.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 13.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 6.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | 16.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 15.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.35× | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.12× | 1.61× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.84× | 1.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.02× | 1.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.52× | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.01× | 1.45× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | 1.20× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
