vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dole plc (DOLE) and Science Applications International Corp (SAIC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dole plc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.3B vs $1.9B, roughly 1.2× Science Applications International Corp). Science Applications International Corp runs the higher net margin — 4.2% vs 0.2%, a 4.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dole plc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.5% vs 2.6%). Science Applications International Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($120.0M vs $66.5M). Over the past eight quarters, Dole plc's revenue compounded faster (3.2% CAGR vs 2.3%).
Dole plc is an Irish-American agricultural multinational corporation headquartered in Dublin, Ireland. The company is among the world's largest producers of fruit and vegetables, operating with 38,500 full-time and seasonal employees who supply some 300 products in 75 countries. Dole reported 2021 revenues of $6.5 billion.
Science Applications International Corporation, Inc. (SAIC) is an American technology company headquartered in Reston, Virginia that provides government services and information technology support.
DOLE vs SAIC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.3B | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $5.1M | $78.0M |
| Gross Margin | 6.8% | 12.2% |
| Operating Margin | 1.1% | 6.9% |
| Net Margin | 0.2% | 4.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.5% | 2.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -64.6% | -3.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.05 | $1.69 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | $78.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.0M | $68.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $106.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.4M | $81.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.1M | $77.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $70.1M | $39.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.0% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.2% | 11.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.3% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 7.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.3% | 4.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.8% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.3% | 2.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.10 | $1.42 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.41 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.15 | $1.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.84 | $1.48 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.74 | $0.77 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $321.0M | $45.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $4.5B | $5.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.64× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $45.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $321.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.1M | $47.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $261.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $46.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $266.4M | $48.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $225.8M | $49.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $245.5M | $94.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5B | $5.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.64× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.52× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.18× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.18× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $87.4M | $129.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $66.5M | $120.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 2.9% | 6.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 17.12× | 1.65× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $13.7M | $478.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $129.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $87.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.3M | $100.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-78.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $143.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.0M | $138.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.2M | $98.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-35.0M | $63.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $120.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.0M | $92.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-131.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $134.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.9M | $132.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.8M | $92.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-53.2M | $52.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.0% | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | 0.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.12× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.84× | 1.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.02× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.35× | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.01× | 1.70× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | 1.27× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.50× | 1.62× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DOLE
Segment breakdown not available.
SAIC
| Prime Contractor | $1.3B | 71% |
| Civilian | $427.0M | 23% |
| Subcontractor | $116.0M | 6% |
| Commercial State And Local Agencies | $7.0M | 0% |
