vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dole plc (DOLE) and W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
W. R. Berkley Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.7B vs $2.3B, roughly 1.6× Dole plc). W. R. Berkley Corporation runs the higher net margin — 14.0% vs 0.2%, a 13.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dole plc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.5% vs 4.0%). Over the past eight quarters, W. R. Berkley Corporation's revenue compounded faster (5.5% CAGR vs 3.2%).
Dole plc is an Irish-American agricultural multinational corporation headquartered in Dublin, Ireland. The company is among the world's largest producers of fruit and vegetables, operating with 38,500 full-time and seasonal employees who supply some 300 products in 75 countries. Dole reported 2021 revenues of $6.5 billion.
William Robert Berkley is the founder and current chairman of W. R. Berkley Corporation and the chairman of the New York University Board of Trustees.
DOLE vs WRB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.3B | $3.7B |
| Net Profit | $5.1M | $515.2M |
| Gross Margin | 6.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 1.1% | — |
| Net Margin | 0.2% | 14.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.5% | 4.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -64.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.05 | $1.31 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $3.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $515.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $449.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $511.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.0M | $401.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.9M | $417.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $576.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.4M | $365.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.1M | $371.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 17.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | 15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.3% | 14.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 14.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 14.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 12.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 10.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 11.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.8% | 11.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.31 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.05 | $1.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.10 | $1.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.41 | $1.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.89 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.15 | $0.91 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.84 | $0.92 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $321.0M | $2.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | — |
| Total Assets | $4.5B | $44.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $321.0M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.1M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $261.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $266.4M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $225.8M | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $9.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $8.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $8.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $7.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $44.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $44.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5B | $43.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $42.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5B | $41.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $40.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | $40.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4B | $38.9B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $87.4M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $66.5M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 2.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 17.12× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $13.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $995.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $87.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.3M | $703.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-78.8M | $743.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $810.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.2M | $881.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-131.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.12× | 2.23× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.84× | 1.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.02× | 1.78× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.41× | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.01× | 3.39× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | 2.37× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
