vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dominari Holdings Inc. (DOMH) and Ouster, Inc. (OUST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ouster, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($48.6M vs $30.1M, roughly 1.6× Dominari Holdings Inc.). Ouster, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 8.2% vs -438.1%, a 446.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dominari Holdings Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (220.4% vs 48.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Dominari Holdings Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (369.1% CAGR vs 34.2%).
Ouster, Inc. is an American lidar technology company headquartered in San Francisco, California. It builds high-resolution, digital 3D lidar sensors for use in autonomous vehicles, industrial, robotics, drones, mapping, defense, and security systems.
DOMH vs OUST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $30.1M | $48.6M |
| Net Profit | $-131.8M | $4.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 42.9% |
| Operating Margin | -8.9% | 17.6% |
| Net Margin | -438.1% | 8.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 220.4% | 48.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -12426.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-6.94 | $0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $48.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $30.1M | $62.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.8M | $39.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.1M | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.1M | $32.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4M | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0M | $28.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2M | $27.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-131.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $125.2M | $-21.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.6M | $-20.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-32.5M | $-22.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.2M | $-25.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.1M | $-23.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | 42.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 60.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | -8.9% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.1% | -61.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -57.0% | -76.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -394.6% | -73.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | -85.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -79.1% | -98.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -44.3% | -93.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -438.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 246.4% | -55.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.7% | -58.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -400.5% | -67.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -104.2% | -91.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -99.1% | -88.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-6.94 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.27 | $-0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.12 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.02 | $-0.42 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.21 | $-0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.67 | $-0.54 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.01 | $-0.53 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $80.5M | $173.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $69.4M | $275.6M |
| Total Assets | $112.9M | $381.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $173.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $80.5M | $208.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $176.2M | $244.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.2M | $226.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.9M | $168.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.2M | $172.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | $151.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.1M | $184.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $275.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $69.4M | $261.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $210.2M | $247.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.6M | $221.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.4M | $167.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $39.9M | $180.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.3M | $171.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.4M | $170.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $381.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $112.9M | $349.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.4M | $353.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $109.3M | $321.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $52.3M | $268.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.1M | $276.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.4M | $255.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.1M | $309.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $22.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $22.7M | $-15.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.9M | $-18.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-353.0K | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.7M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.7M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4M | $-21.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-37.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-5.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-22.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -59.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -50.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -6.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -16.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -13.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -15.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -81.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 35.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.04× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.02× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -15.65× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DOMH
| Chief Operating Decision Maker | $30.1M | 100% |
| Commissions | $458.0K | 2% |
OUST
| Product revenue | $48.2M | 99% |
| Royalties | $347.0K | 1% |
