vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dexcom (DXCM) and EnerSys (ENS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dexcom is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $919.1M, roughly 1.4× EnerSys). Dexcom runs the higher net margin — 21.2% vs 9.8%, a 11.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dexcom posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.6% vs 1.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Dexcom's revenue compounded faster (12.0% CAGR vs 0.5%).
Dexcom, Inc. is an American multinational healthcare company that develops, manufactures, produces and distributes a line of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems for diabetes management. It operates internationally with global headquarters and R&D center in San Diego, California, U.S.A. and manufacturing facilities in Mesa, Arizona, U.S.A.; Batu Kawan, Malaysia and Athenry, County Galway, Ireland.
EnerSys is a stored energy systems and technology provider for industrial applications. The company manufactures reserve-power and motive-power batteries, battery chargers, power equipment, battery accessories and outdoor equipment enclosures.
DXCM vs ENS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $919.1M |
| Net Profit | $267.3M | $90.4M |
| Gross Margin | 62.9% | 30.1% |
| Operating Margin | 25.6% | 13.5% |
| Net Margin | 21.2% | 9.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.6% | 1.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 153.6% | -21.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.67 | $2.40 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $919.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $951.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $893.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $974.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $906.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $994.2M | $883.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $852.9M |
| Q1 26 | $267.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $267.3M | $90.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $283.8M | $68.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $179.8M | $57.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $105.4M | $96.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.7M | $114.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $134.6M | $82.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.5M | $70.1M |
| Q1 26 | 62.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 62.9% | 30.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.5% | 29.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.5% | 28.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 56.9% | 31.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 58.9% | 32.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.7% | 28.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 62.4% | 27.9% |
| Q1 26 | 25.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.6% | 13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.1% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.4% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.9% | 13.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.0% | 15.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.3% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.7% | 10.7% |
| Q1 26 | 21.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.2% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.5% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.2% | 9.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.6% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.5% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.3% | 8.2% |
| Q1 26 | $0.67 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.67 | $2.40 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.70 | $1.80 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.45 | $1.46 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.27 | $2.39 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.37 | $2.88 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.34 | $2.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.35 | $1.71 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $917.7M | $450.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $1.9B |
| Total Assets | $6.3B | $4.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $917.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $917.7M | $450.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $388.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $346.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $904.9M | $343.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $606.1M | $463.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $621.2M | $407.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $939.2M | $344.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | $6.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.3B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.3B | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.8B | $3.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $184.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $171.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 18.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.04× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $441.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $294.0M | $184.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $659.9M | $218.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $303.0M | $968.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $183.8M | $135.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $301.4M | $81.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $199.5M | $33.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $279.4M | $10.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $192.1M | $171.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $579.4M | $197.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $208.9M | $-32.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.8M | $104.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $176.8M | $56.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $88.3M | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $213.3M | $-25.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.3% | 18.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 47.9% | 20.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.1% | -3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | 10.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.9% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.2% | -3.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.1% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.4% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | 4.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.10× | 2.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.33× | 3.19× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.69× | 0.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.74× | 1.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.99× | 0.71× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.48× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.95× | 0.15× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DXCM
Segment breakdown not available.
ENS
| Energy Systems | $399.5M | 43% |
| Motive Power | $352.0M | 38% |
| Services | $92.6M | 10% |
| Transferred Over Time | $38.2M | 4% |
| Other | $36.8M | 4% |
