vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ECARX Holdings Inc. (ECX) and OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC (OXM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ECARX Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($323.3M vs $307.3M, roughly 1.1× OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC). OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — -20.7% vs -21.4%, a 0.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ECARX Holdings Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.5% vs -0.2%). OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-47.9M vs $-86.5M).
ECARX Holdings Inc. is a global mobility technology provider specializing in integrated smart vehicle solutions, including in-vehicle infotainment systems, advanced driver assistance technologies, and connected car cloud services. It primarily partners with automotive manufacturers across the world, with a strong operational presence in the Chinese and European markets.
Oxford Industries, Inc. is a publicly traded clothing company in the United States that specializes in high-end clothing and apparel. The company carries many major labels, including Tommy Bahama, Lilly Pulitzer, Johnny Was and Southern Tide.
ECX vs OXM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $323.3M | $307.3M |
| Net Profit | $-69.1M | $-63.7M |
| Gross Margin | 15.5% | 60.3% |
| Operating Margin | -20.2% | -27.7% |
| Net Margin | -21.4% | -20.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.5% | -0.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.8% | -1517.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.20 | $-4.28 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $307.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $403.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.3M | $392.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $308.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $419.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $303.5M | $398.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $404.4M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $326.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-63.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $16.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-69.1M | $26.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $40.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-79.2M | $38.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-60.1M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $10.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 60.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 61.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | 64.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 63.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 63.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.6% | 64.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 60.9% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 62.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | -27.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -20.2% | 9.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -22.2% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -20.1% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 4.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | -20.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -21.4% | 6.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.1% | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -14.9% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 3.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-4.28 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.20 | $1.70 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.57 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.23 | $2.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-3.72 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $0.68 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $86.2M | $8.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-293.7M | $528.0M |
| Total Assets | $494.9M | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.2M | $8.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $18.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $108.4M | $7.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.6M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $7.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $29.0M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $528.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $597.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-293.7M | $592.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $612.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $621.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-198.5M | $592.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $560.9M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $627.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $494.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $555.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-82.0M | $-9.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-86.5M | $-47.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -26.7% | -15.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 12.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-79.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-9.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $83.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-82.0M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-18.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $88.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-57.1M | $32.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $74.9M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $16.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-47.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $52.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-86.5M | $-27.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-56.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-64.9M | $21.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $55.3M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-6.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | -15.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -26.7% | -7.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -18.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -21.4% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -1.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 12.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 7.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.15× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 1.57× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ECX
Segment breakdown not available.
OXM
| Sales Channel Retail | $162.9M | 53% |
| Sales Channel Wholesale | $61.3M | 20% |
| Johnny Was | $45.4M | 15% |
| Sales Channel Food And Beverage | $29.3M | 10% |
| Other Foreign Countries | $9.0M | 3% |
