vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Edible Garden AG Inc (EDBL) and Solana Co (HSDT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Solana Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.2M vs $4.1M, roughly 1.3× Edible Garden AG Inc). On growth, Solana Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2725.9% vs 6.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Solana Co's revenue compounded faster (522.3% CAGR vs 14.8%).
Edible Garden AG Inc is a U.S.-based sustainable agricultural company specializing in hydroponically grown fresh organic herbs, leafy greens, and specialty vegetables. It distributes its pesticide-free produce to leading grocery retailers, food service operators, and direct-to-consumer platforms across North America, prioritizing eco-friendly, low-water farming practices.
Solana is a Mexican cottage manufacturer of sports, racing, and kids' automobiles based in Mexico City. The family run company has operated since 1936, with a total production of fewer than fifty cars; the majority of them one-offs. The family is heavily involved in motor sports; the most prominent member was Moisés Solana, who raced family-built cars and later in Formula One.
EDBL vs HSDT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.1M | $5.2M |
| Net Profit | — | $325.6M |
| Gross Margin | -29.0% | 96.6% |
| Operating Margin | -138.6% | -3845.8% |
| Net Margin | — | 6227.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.6% | 2725.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 8388.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-109.97 | $111.28 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.1M | $5.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8M | $697.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1M | $43.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7M | $49.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9M | $185.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6M | $51.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3M | $182.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1M | $135.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | $325.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.0M | $-352.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.0M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.3M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.1M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.9M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $-2.5M |
| Q4 25 | -29.0% | 96.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | 85.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | 16.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.7% | 35.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 8.9% |
| Q4 25 | -138.6% | -3845.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -126.3% | -5086.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.2% | -7725.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -107.7% | -8185.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -70.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -57.7% | -7980.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -27.7% | -1796.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -123.3% | -2530.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 6227.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -143.6% | -50612.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -128.5% | -22867.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -122.3% | -7832.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -79.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -79.8% | -7227.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -45.3% | -885.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -127.0% | -1863.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-109.97 | $111.28 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.38 | $-32.89 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.58 | $-79.73 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.47 | $-0.51 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-330.78 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.32 | $-744.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-30.02 | $-485.30 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-341.14 | $-3.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $7.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $12.5M | $300.9M |
| Total Assets | $20.6M | $303.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.13× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $7.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $124.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $12.5M | $300.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.9M | $-152.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6M | $6.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9M | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $3.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $511.0K | $6.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.1M | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | $20.6M | $303.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.1M | $475.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.8M | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | $3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9M | $5.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9M | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.3M | $5.8M |
| Q4 25 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.24× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.61× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.7M | $-16.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -66.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.05× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-12.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-2.7M | $-16.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.4M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.4M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.3M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.8M | $-11.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.6M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.1M | $-3.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9M | $-11.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.1M | $-3.0M |
| Q4 25 | -66.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -98.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -110.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -125.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -48.6% | -5970.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -43.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -110.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.6% | -2226.7% |
| Q4 25 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.05× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EDBL
| Herbs Produce Floral | $3.6M | 86% |
| Other | $576.0K | 14% |
HSDT
Segment breakdown not available.
