vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Edible Garden AG Inc (EDBL) and KOSS CORP (KOSS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Edible Garden AG Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.1M vs $2.9M, roughly 1.4× KOSS CORP). On growth, Edible Garden AG Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.6% vs -19.6%). KOSS CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-1.1M vs $-2.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Edible Garden AG Inc's revenue compounded faster (14.8% CAGR vs 4.2%).
Edible Garden AG Inc is a U.S.-based sustainable agricultural company specializing in hydroponically grown fresh organic herbs, leafy greens, and specialty vegetables. It distributes its pesticide-free produce to leading grocery retailers, food service operators, and direct-to-consumer platforms across North America, prioritizing eco-friendly, low-water farming practices.
Koss Corporation is a company in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, US that manufactures headphones. The company created the first high-fidelity stereo headphones in 1958.
EDBL vs KOSS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.1M | $2.9M |
| Net Profit | — | $-565.4K |
| Gross Margin | -29.0% | 29.0% |
| Operating Margin | -138.6% | -35.5% |
| Net Margin | — | -19.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.6% | -19.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -700.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-109.97 | $-0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.1M | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8M | $4.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1M | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7M | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9M | $3.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6M | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3M | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1M | $2.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-565.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.0M | $243.7K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.0M | $-232.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.3M | $-316.7K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.1M | $94.1K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.1M | $-419.5K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.9M | $-110.4K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $-313.8K |
| Q4 25 | -29.0% | 29.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | 40.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.2% | 36.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | 39.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | 39.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.1% | 36.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.7% | 40.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 31.9% |
| Q4 25 | -138.6% | -35.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -126.3% | -1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.2% | -14.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -107.7% | -18.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -70.8% | -4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -57.7% | -19.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -27.7% | -11.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -123.3% | -23.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | -19.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -143.6% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -128.5% | -7.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -122.3% | -11.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -79.5% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -79.8% | -13.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -45.3% | -3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -127.0% | -11.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-109.97 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.38 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.58 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.47 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-330.78 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.32 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-30.02 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-341.14 | $-0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $15.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $12.5M | $30.3M |
| Total Assets | $20.6M | $36.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.13× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $15.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $16.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $15.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $14.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $12.5M | $30.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.9M | $30.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6M | $30.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9M | $30.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $31.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $30.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $511.0K | $31.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.1M | $31.1M |
| Q4 25 | $20.6M | $36.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.1M | $37.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.8M | $37.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | $37.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | $37.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9M | $38.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9M | $37.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.3M | $37.6M |
| Q4 25 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.24× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.61× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.7M | $-760.8K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.8M | $-1.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -66.8% | -37.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.3% | 10.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-12.4M | $-546.7K |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-2.7M | $-760.8K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.4M | $762.6K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.4M | $-534.9K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.3M | $370.4K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.8M | $-252.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1M | $201.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.6M | $-174.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.1M | $328.6K |
| Q4 25 | $-2.8M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.8M | $761.5K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.5M | $-541.8K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.4M | $306.2K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9M | $-314.3K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1M | $-155.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.7M | $-174.8K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.1M | $269.3K |
| Q4 25 | -66.8% | -37.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -98.9% | 18.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -110.8% | -17.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -125.5% | 11.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -48.6% | -8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -43.4% | -4.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -110.2% | -6.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.6% | 10.2% |
| Q4 25 | 2.3% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.5% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | 2.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.13× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2.68× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EDBL
| Herbs Produce Floral | $3.6M | 86% |
| Other | $576.0K | 14% |
KOSS
Segment breakdown not available.