vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Edible Garden AG Inc (EDBL) and Peraso Inc. (PRSO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Edible Garden AG Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.1M vs $2.9M, roughly 1.4× Peraso Inc.). On growth, Edible Garden AG Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.6% vs -22.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Edible Garden AG Inc's revenue compounded faster (14.8% CAGR vs 1.0%).
Edible Garden AG Inc is a U.S.-based sustainable agricultural company specializing in hydroponically grown fresh organic herbs, leafy greens, and specialty vegetables. It distributes its pesticide-free produce to leading grocery retailers, food service operators, and direct-to-consumer platforms across North America, prioritizing eco-friendly, low-water farming practices.
Peraso Inc. is a semiconductor technology firm specializing in the design and production of high-performance millimeter wave (mmWave) integrated circuits and modules. It delivers 5G and next-generation wireless connectivity solutions for telecom infrastructure, industrial IoT, fixed wireless access and consumer electronics segments, serving customers across North America, Asia Pacific and European markets.
EDBL vs PRSO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.1M | $2.9M |
| Net Profit | — | $-1.2M |
| Gross Margin | -29.0% | 52.2% |
| Operating Margin | -138.6% | -44.6% |
| Net Margin | — | -43.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.6% | -22.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 20.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-109.97 | $-0.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.1M | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8M | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7M | $3.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9M | $3.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6M | $3.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3M | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1M | $2.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.0M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.0M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.3M | $-471.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.1M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.1M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.9M | $-4.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $-2.0M |
| Q4 25 | -29.0% | 52.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | 56.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.2% | 48.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | 69.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | 56.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.1% | 47.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.7% | 55.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 46.4% |
| Q4 25 | -138.6% | -44.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -126.3% | -36.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.2% | -80.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -107.7% | -13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -70.8% | -44.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -57.7% | -70.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -27.7% | -105.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -123.3% | -128.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | -43.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -143.6% | -37.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -128.5% | -82.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -122.3% | -12.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -79.5% | -42.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -79.8% | -70.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -45.3% | -104.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -127.0% | -72.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-109.97 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.38 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.58 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.47 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-330.78 | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.32 | $-0.98 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-30.02 | $-1.88 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-341.14 | $-1.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $2.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $12.5M | $4.6M |
| Total Assets | $20.6M | $6.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.13× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.4M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $12.5M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.9M | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9M | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $511.0K | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.1M | $6.7M |
| Q4 25 | $20.6M | $6.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.1M | $6.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.8M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | $6.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | $7.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9M | $7.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9M | $9.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.3M | $11.5M |
| Q4 25 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.24× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.61× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.7M | $-1.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -66.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-12.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-2.7M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.4M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.4M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.3M | $-966.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.8M | $-687.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1M | $-683.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.6M | $-659.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.1M | $-2.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.8M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | -66.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -98.9% | -48.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -110.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -125.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -48.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -43.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -110.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.5% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EDBL
| Herbs Produce Floral | $3.6M | 86% |
| Other | $576.0K | 14% |
PRSO
| Products | $2.8M | 96% |
| Other | $105.0K | 4% |
