vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Edible Garden AG Inc (EDBL) and TECHPRECISION CORP (TPCS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TECHPRECISION CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($7.1M vs $4.1M, roughly 1.7× Edible Garden AG Inc). On growth, Edible Garden AG Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.6% vs -6.9%). TECHPRECISION CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-827.0K vs $-2.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Edible Garden AG Inc's revenue compounded faster (14.8% CAGR vs -9.2%).
Edible Garden AG Inc is a U.S.-based sustainable agricultural company specializing in hydroponically grown fresh organic herbs, leafy greens, and specialty vegetables. It distributes its pesticide-free produce to leading grocery retailers, food service operators, and direct-to-consumer platforms across North America, prioritizing eco-friendly, low-water farming practices.
TechPrecision Corp is a manufacturer of custom high-precision metal fabricated components and integrated systems, serving aerospace, defense, medical technology, renewable energy, and industrial end markets primarily across North America and Europe. It specializes in producing tight-tolerance, mission-critical parts that adhere to rigorous industry quality requirements.
EDBL vs TPCS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.1M | $7.1M |
| Net Profit | — | $-1.5M |
| Gross Margin | -29.0% | 5.4% |
| Operating Margin | -138.6% | -19.1% |
| Net Margin | — | -20.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.6% | -6.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -84.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-109.97 | $-0.15 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.1M | $7.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1M | $7.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7M | $9.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9M | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6M | $8.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3M | $8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1M | $8.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.0M | $825.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.0M | $-597.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.3M | $112.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.1M | $-799.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.1M | $-601.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.9M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $-5.1M |
| Q4 25 | -29.0% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.2% | 14.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | 22.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | 13.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.1% | 11.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.7% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 14.3% |
| Q4 25 | -138.6% | -19.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -126.3% | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.2% | -6.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -107.7% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -70.8% | -9.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -57.7% | -5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -27.7% | -16.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -123.3% | -28.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | -20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -143.6% | 9.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -128.5% | -8.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -122.3% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -79.5% | -10.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -79.8% | -6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -45.3% | -18.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -127.0% | -59.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-109.97 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.38 | $0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.58 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.47 | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-330.78 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.32 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-30.02 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-341.14 | $-0.59 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $50.0K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $12.5M | $8.0M |
| Total Assets | $20.6M | $32.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.13× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $50.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $220.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $143.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $195.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $165.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $132.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $44.8K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $138.0K |
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4M | $3.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $19.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $12.5M | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.9M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6M | $8.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9M | $8.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $8.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $8.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $511.0K | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.1M | $7.8M |
| Q4 25 | $20.6M | $32.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.1M | $33.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.8M | $32.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | $33.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | $32.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9M | $35.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9M | $35.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.3M | $34.7M |
| Q4 25 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.24× | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.61× | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.7M | $183.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.8M | $-827.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -66.8% | -11.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.3% | 14.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-12.4M | $-4.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-2.7M | $183.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.4M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.4M | $646.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.3M | $396.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.8M | $-570.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1M | $-532.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.6M | $107.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.1M | $-452.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-2.8M | $-827.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.8M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.5M | $-604.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.4M | $-930.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.7M | $-94.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.1M | $-900.0K |
| Q4 25 | -66.8% | -11.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -98.9% | -22.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -110.8% | -8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -125.5% | -9.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -48.6% | -22.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -43.4% | -21.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -110.2% | -1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.6% | -10.5% |
| Q4 25 | 2.3% | 14.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.5% | 11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 16.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | 14.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 15.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | 5.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.54× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EDBL
| Herbs Produce Floral | $3.6M | 86% |
| Other | $576.0K | 14% |
TPCS
| Defense | $6.7M | 94% |
| Other | $410.0K | 6% |
