vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC. (ENR) and SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL (SCI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $778.9M, roughly 1.4× ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC.). SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL runs the higher net margin — 14.3% vs -0.4%, a 14.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.5% vs 1.7%). ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($124.2M vs $87.2M). Over the past eight quarters, ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (8.4% CAGR vs 3.1%).
Energizer Holdings, Inc. is an American manufacturer and one of the world's largest manufacturers of batteries, headquartered in Clayton, Missouri. It produces batteries under the Energizer, Ray-O-Vac, Varta, and Eveready brand names and formerly owned several personal care businesses until it separated that side of the business into a new company called Edgewell Personal Care in 2015.
International Distribution Services Limited is a British company providing postal and courier services. IDS was created in 2013 by the UK government as a new holding company of Royal Mail, and a majority of its shares were then sold on the London Stock Exchange, with the government initially retaining a 30 per cent at the time. As of April 2025, IDS is owned and operated by Czech-based EP Group, owned by Daniel Křetínský.
ENR vs SCI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $778.9M | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $-3.4M | $159.4M |
| Gross Margin | 32.9% | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | -0.6% | 24.8% |
| Net Margin | -0.4% | 14.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.5% | 1.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -115.2% | 5.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $778.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $832.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $725.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $662.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $731.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $805.7M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $701.4M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $663.3M | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | $-3.4M | $159.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.9M | $117.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $153.5M | $122.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.3M | $142.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.3M | $151.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.6M | $117.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-43.8M | $118.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $32.4M | $131.3M |
| Q4 25 | 32.9% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.6% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 55.1% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.1% | 27.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.8% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.1% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.5% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.2% | 26.2% |
| Q4 25 | -0.6% | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.6% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.5% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.1% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.2% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.4% | 22.2% |
| Q4 25 | -0.4% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.2% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.9% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.2% | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.9% | 12.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.89 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $214.8M | $243.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $141.3M | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $4.4B | $18.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $214.8M | $243.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $236.2M | $241.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $171.1M | $255.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $139.3M | $227.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $195.9M | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $216.9M | $185.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $146.7M | $184.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $158.1M | $205.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.2B | $4.6B |
| Q4 25 | $141.3M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.9M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $183.2M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $133.9M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $140.6M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $135.8M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.4M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $191.3M | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $18.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2B | $17.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | $17.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | $17.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $16.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.3B | $16.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.28× | 3.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.57× | 3.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.56× | 2.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.17× | 2.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.51× | 2.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.04× | 3.05× | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.86× | 2.90× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $149.5M | $212.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $124.2M | $87.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.9% | 7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.2% | 11.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $145.0M | $554.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $149.5M | $212.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.5M | $252.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.4M | $166.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-12.8M | $311.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.0M | $264.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $168.9M | $263.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.8M | $196.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $36.8M | $220.1M |
| Q4 25 | $124.2M | $87.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.7M | $150.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | $83.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.8M | $233.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.4M | $151.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $141.5M | $162.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.3M | $100.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.3M | $140.3M |
| Q4 25 | 15.9% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.1% | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.8% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.6% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 13.4% |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.7% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.4% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | 7.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.76× | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.14× | 1.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.45× | 2.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.45× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.55× | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.67× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.14× | 1.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ENR
| Alkaline Batteries | $666.5M | 86% |
| Auto Care | $93.7M | 12% |
| Lights | $18.7M | 2% |
SCI
| Cemetery | $510.9M | 46% |
| Funeral Matured Preneed Revenue | $196.5M | 18% |
| Cemetery Recognized Preneed Merchandise And Service Revenue | $107.4M | 10% |
| Cemetery Atneed Revenue | $104.9M | 9% |
| CA | $56.4M | 5% |
| Funeral Other Revenue | $54.6M | 5% |
| Cemetery Other Revenue | $40.2M | 4% |
| Nonfuneral Home Revenue | $28.1M | 3% |
| Non Funeral Home Preneed Sales Revenue | $22.0M | 2% |
