vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC. (ENR) and SCANSOURCE, INC. (SCSC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($778.9M vs $766.5M, roughly 1.0× SCANSOURCE, INC.). SCANSOURCE, INC. runs the higher net margin — 2.2% vs -0.4%, a 2.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.5% vs 2.5%). ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($124.2M vs $28.9M). Over the past eight quarters, ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (8.4% CAGR vs 0.9%).
Energizer Holdings, Inc. is an American manufacturer and one of the world's largest manufacturers of batteries, headquartered in Clayton, Missouri. It produces batteries under the Energizer, Ray-O-Vac, Varta, and Eveready brand names and formerly owned several personal care businesses until it separated that side of the business into a new company called Edgewell Personal Care in 2015.
ScanSource, Inc. is a leading global specialty technology distributor offering a broad portfolio of solutions including point-of-sale systems, barcode scanning tools, cybersecurity products, cloud services and communication solutions. It primarily serves value-added resellers, managed service providers and enterprise clients across North America, Latin America and Europe, covering retail, healthcare, industrial and public sector core segments.
ENR vs SCSC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $778.9M | $766.5M |
| Net Profit | $-3.4M | $16.5M |
| Gross Margin | 32.9% | 13.4% |
| Operating Margin | -0.6% | 2.3% |
| Net Margin | -0.4% | 2.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.5% | 2.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -115.2% | -3.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.75 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $778.9M | $766.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $832.8M | $739.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $725.3M | $812.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $662.9M | $704.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $731.7M | $747.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $805.7M | $775.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $701.4M | $746.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $663.3M | $752.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.4M | $16.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.9M | $19.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $153.5M | $20.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.3M | $17.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.3M | $17.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.6M | $17.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-43.8M | $16.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $32.4M | $12.8M |
| Q4 25 | 32.9% | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.6% | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 55.1% | 12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.1% | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.8% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.1% | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.5% | 13.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.2% | 12.6% |
| Q4 25 | -0.6% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.6% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.5% | 3.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.1% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.2% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.4% | 2.3% |
| Q4 25 | -0.4% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.2% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.9% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.2% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.9% | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.89 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.87 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.74 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.70 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.66 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.50 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $214.8M | $83.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $141.3M | $910.9M |
| Total Assets | $4.4B | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $214.8M | $83.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $236.2M | $124.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $171.1M | $126.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $139.3M | $146.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $195.9M | $110.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $216.9M | $145.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $146.7M | $185.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $158.1M | $159.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | $141.3M | $910.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.9M | $914.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $183.2M | $906.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $133.9M | $901.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $140.6M | $900.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $135.8M | $920.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.4M | $924.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $191.3M | $944.1M |
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.3B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.28× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.57× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.56× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.17× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.51× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.04× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.86× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $149.5M | $30.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $124.2M | $28.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.9% | 3.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.2% | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.87× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $145.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $149.5M | $30.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.5M | $23.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-12.8M | $66.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.0M | $-6.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $168.9M | $44.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $36.8M | $160.2M |
| Q4 25 | $124.2M | $28.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.7M | $20.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.8M | $64.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.4M | $-8.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $141.5M | $42.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.3M | $157.7M |
| Q4 25 | 15.9% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.1% | 9.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.8% | -1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.6% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 21.0% |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.87× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.76× | 1.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.14× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.45× | 3.79× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.45× | -0.36× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.55× | 2.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.14× | 12.51× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ENR
| Alkaline Batteries | $666.5M | 86% |
| Auto Care | $93.7M | 12% |
| Lights | $18.7M | 2% |
SCSC
| Products And Services | $723.4M | 94% |
| Intelisys Advisory | $25.0M | 3% |
| Recurring Revenue | $18.2M | 2% |