vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC. (ENR) and Zebra Technologies (ZBRA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Zebra Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $778.9M, roughly 1.9× ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC.). Zebra Technologies runs the higher net margin — 4.7% vs -0.4%, a 5.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Zebra Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.6% vs 6.5%). Zebra Technologies produced more free cash flow last quarter ($327.0M vs $124.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Zebra Technologies's revenue compounded faster (12.0% CAGR vs 8.4%).
Energizer Holdings, Inc. is an American manufacturer and one of the world's largest manufacturers of batteries, headquartered in Clayton, Missouri. It produces batteries under the Energizer, Ray-O-Vac, Varta, and Eveready brand names and formerly owned several personal care businesses until it separated that side of the business into a new company called Edgewell Personal Care in 2015.
Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBR), commonly known as Zebra, is an American multinational technology conglomerate corporation specializing in smart data capture systems. Zebra is headquartered in Lincolnshire, Illinois outside of Chicago with 10,700 employees across 57 countries.
ENR vs ZBRA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $778.9M | $1.5B |
| Net Profit | $-3.4M | $70.0M |
| Gross Margin | 32.9% | 47.3% |
| Operating Margin | -0.6% | 9.4% |
| Net Margin | -0.4% | 4.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.5% | 10.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -115.2% | -57.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.40 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $778.9M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $832.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $725.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $662.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $731.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $805.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $701.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $663.3M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $-3.4M | $70.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.9M | $101.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $153.5M | $112.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.3M | $136.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.3M | $163.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.6M | $137.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-43.8M | $113.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $32.4M | $115.0M |
| Q4 25 | 32.9% | 47.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.6% | 48.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 55.1% | 47.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.1% | 49.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.8% | 48.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.1% | 48.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.5% | 48.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.2% | 47.9% |
| Q4 25 | -0.6% | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.6% | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.5% | 14.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.1% | 16.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.2% | 13.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.4% | 13.5% |
| Q4 25 | -0.4% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.2% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 10.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.9% | 10.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.2% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.9% | 9.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.40 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.97 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.62 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.64 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.17 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.23 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $214.8M | $125.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $141.3M | $3.6B |
| Total Assets | $4.4B | $8.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $214.8M | $125.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $236.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $171.1M | $872.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $139.3M | $879.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $195.9M | $901.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $216.9M | $676.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $146.7M | $411.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $158.1M | $127.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.2B | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | $141.3M | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.9M | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $183.2M | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $133.9M | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $140.6M | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $135.8M | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.4M | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $191.3M | $3.2B |
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6B | $8.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $7.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2B | $7.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | $8.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | $7.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $7.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.3B | $7.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.28× | 0.58× | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.57× | 0.60× | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.56× | 0.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.17× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.51× | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.04× | 0.66× | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.86× | 0.66× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $149.5M | $357.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $124.2M | $327.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.9% | 22.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.2% | 2.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 5.10× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $145.0M | $831.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $149.5M | $357.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.5M | $235.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.4M | $147.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-12.8M | $178.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.0M | $306.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $168.9M | $294.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.8M | $288.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $36.8M | $125.0M |
| Q4 25 | $124.2M | $327.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.7M | $216.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | $130.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.8M | $158.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.4M | $288.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $141.5M | $277.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.3M | $278.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.3M | $111.0M |
| Q4 25 | 15.9% | 22.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.1% | 12.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.8% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.6% | 22.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 9.4% |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.7% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | 1.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.76× | 2.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.14× | 1.31× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.45× | 1.31× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.45× | 1.88× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.55× | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.55× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.14× | 1.09× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ENR
| Alkaline Batteries | $666.5M | 86% |
| Auto Care | $93.7M | 12% |
| Lights | $18.7M | 2% |
ZBRA
| Tangible Products | $1.2B | 83% |
| Service And Software | $255.0M | 17% |
