vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EnerSys (ENS) and SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL (SCI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $919.1M, roughly 1.2× EnerSys). SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL runs the higher net margin — 14.3% vs 9.8%, a 4.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.7% vs 1.4%). EnerSys produced more free cash flow last quarter ($171.3M vs $87.2M). Over the past eight quarters, SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL's revenue compounded faster (3.1% CAGR vs 0.5%).
EnerSys is a stored energy systems and technology provider for industrial applications. The company manufactures reserve-power and motive-power batteries, battery chargers, power equipment, battery accessories and outdoor equipment enclosures.
International Distribution Services Limited is a British company providing postal and courier services. IDS was created in 2013 by the UK government as a new holding company of Royal Mail, and a majority of its shares were then sold on the London Stock Exchange, with the government initially retaining a 30 per cent at the time. As of April 2025, IDS is owned and operated by Czech-based EP Group, owned by Daniel Křetínský.
ENS vs SCI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $919.1M | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $90.4M | $159.4M |
| Gross Margin | 30.1% | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 13.5% | 24.8% |
| Net Margin | 9.8% | 14.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.4% | 1.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.3% | 5.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.40 | $1.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $919.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $951.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $893.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $974.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $906.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $883.7M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $852.9M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $910.7M | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | $90.4M | $159.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $68.4M | $117.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.5M | $122.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.5M | $142.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $114.8M | $151.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.3M | $117.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $70.1M | $118.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $60.9M | $131.3M |
| Q4 25 | 30.1% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.1% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.4% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.2% | 27.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.9% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.5% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.9% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.9% | 26.2% |
| Q4 25 | 13.5% | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.7% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.5% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.7% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.7% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.9% | 22.2% |
| Q4 25 | 9.8% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.9% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.7% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.2% | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.7% | 12.6% |
| Q4 25 | $2.40 | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.80 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.46 | $0.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.39 | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.88 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.01 | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.71 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.48 | $0.89 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $450.1M | $243.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.9B | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $4.0B | $18.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $450.1M | $243.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $388.6M | $241.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $346.7M | $255.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $343.1M | $227.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $463.2M | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $407.9M | $185.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $344.1M | $184.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $333.3M | $205.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $802.0M | $4.6B |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $18.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $17.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $17.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $17.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $16.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | $16.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.57× | 2.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.05× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.46× | 2.90× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $184.6M | $212.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $171.3M | $87.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 18.6% | 7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 11.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.04× | 1.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $441.3M | $554.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $184.6M | $212.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $218.0M | $252.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $968.0K | $166.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $135.2M | $311.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.1M | $264.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.6M | $263.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.4M | $196.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $220.1M |
| Q4 25 | $171.3M | $87.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $197.1M | $150.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-32.1M | $83.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $104.9M | $233.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.8M | $151.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $162.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.7M | $100.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $140.3M |
| Q4 25 | 18.6% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.7% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.6% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.8% | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.3% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.0% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 13.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.7% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.4% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.6% |
| Q4 25 | 2.04× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.19× | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.02× | 1.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.40× | 2.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.71× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.41× | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.15× | 1.67× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ENS
| Energy Systems | $399.5M | 43% |
| Motive Power | $352.0M | 38% |
| Services | $92.6M | 10% |
| Transferred Over Time | $38.2M | 4% |
| Other | $36.8M | 4% |
SCI
| Cemetery | $510.9M | 46% |
| Funeral Matured Preneed Revenue | $196.5M | 18% |
| Cemetery Recognized Preneed Merchandise And Service Revenue | $107.4M | 10% |
| Cemetery Atneed Revenue | $104.9M | 9% |
| CA | $56.4M | 5% |
| Funeral Other Revenue | $54.6M | 5% |
| Cemetery Other Revenue | $40.2M | 4% |
| Nonfuneral Home Revenue | $28.1M | 3% |
| Non Funeral Home Preneed Sales Revenue | $22.0M | 2% |
