vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Enova International, Inc. (ENVA) and Taylor Morrison Home Corp (TMHC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Taylor Morrison Home Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $875.1M, roughly 1.6× Enova International, Inc.). Enova International, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.4% vs 7.1%, a 3.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Enova International, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.4% vs -26.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Enova International, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (18.0% CAGR vs -16.5%).
Enova International, Inc. is a global fintech firm providing online financial solutions including short-term consumer loans and small business financing. It operates mainly across North America, South America and Europe, using advanced data analytics to assess creditworthiness and deliver tailored products to underserved borrower segments.
Taylor Morrison is one of the largest home building companies in the United States. Its corporate headquarters are in Scottsdale, Arizona. The company formed when Taylor Woodrow and Morrison Homes joined forces in July 2007. Taylor Morrison operates in Arizona, California, Colorado, Georgia, Florida, North Carolina, South Carolina, Nevada, Indiana, and Texas, building mid-to-upscale housing, as well as first-time and mid-market homes.
ENVA vs TMHC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $875.1M | $1.4B |
| Net Profit | $91.1M | $98.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 21.0% |
| Operating Margin | 23.7% | — |
| Net Margin | 10.4% | 7.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 17.4% | -26.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 24.9% | -53.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.46 | $1.12 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $875.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $839.4M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $802.7M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $764.0M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $745.5M | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $729.6M | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $689.9M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $628.4M | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | $91.1M | $98.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $79.0M | $174.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $80.3M | $201.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $76.1M | $193.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.9M | $213.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $63.7M | $242.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.4M | $251.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $53.9M | $199.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 59.8% | 22.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 57.4% | 22.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 57.8% | 23.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 57.2% | 24.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 56.6% | 23.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 58.0% | 25.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 58.9% | 23.7% |
| Q1 26 | 23.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | 10.4% | 7.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.4% | 8.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.0% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.0% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | 11.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.3% | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 10.0% |
| Q1 26 | $3.46 | $1.12 | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.94 | $1.77 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.03 | $2.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.86 | $1.92 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.69 | $2.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.29 | $2.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.57 | $2.37 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.93 | $1.86 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $96.1M | $652.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.8B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $6.2B |
| Total Assets | $6.9B | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $96.1M | $652.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $71.7M | $850.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $53.6M | $370.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.6M | $130.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $55.5M | $377.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $73.9M | $487.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.5M | $256.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.1M | $246.8M |
| Q1 26 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.6B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $2.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $6.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $6.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $6.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $6.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $5.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $5.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $5.5B |
| Q1 26 | $6.9B | $9.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.5B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.0B | $9.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7B | $9.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5B | $9.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3B | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0B | $9.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8B | $9.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.37× | 0.36× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.20× | 0.35× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.23× | 0.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.14× | 0.35× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.98× | 0.36× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.79× | 0.37× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.78× | 0.39× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ENVA
Segment breakdown not available.
TMHC
| Home closings revenue, net | $1.3B | 95% |
| Financial services revenue, net | $49.3M | 4% |
| Land closings revenue | $14.5M | 1% |
| Amenity and other revenue | $11.9M | 1% |
