vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EPAM Systems (EPAM) and Kontoor Brands, Inc. (KTB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
EPAM Systems is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $613.3M, roughly 2.3× Kontoor Brands, Inc.). Kontoor Brands, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 15.1% vs 5.9%, a 9.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kontoor Brands, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (45.0% vs 7.6%). Over the past eight quarters, EPAM Systems's revenue compounded faster (10.5% CAGR vs -1.4%).
EPAM Systems, Inc. is an American company that specializes in software engineering services, digital platform engineering, and digital product design, operating out of Newtown, Pennsylvania. EPAM is a founding member of the MACH Alliance.
Kontoor Brands is an American clothing company. It was a spin off from the VF Corporation in May 2019, and markets clothing under the Lee, Wrangler and Helly Hansen brand names.
EPAM vs KTB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $613.3M |
| Net Profit | $82.5M | $92.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 53.7% |
| Operating Margin | 8.3% | 14.7% |
| Net Margin | 5.9% | 15.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.6% | 45.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.3% | 116.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.52 | $1.65 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.4B | $613.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $853.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $658.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $622.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $699.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $670.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $606.9M |
| Q1 26 | $82.5M | $92.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $109.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.8M | $36.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.0M | $73.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $73.5M | $42.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $103.3M | $64.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.3M | $70.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $98.6M | $51.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 53.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 30.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.5% | 41.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.8% | 46.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.9% | 47.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.4% | 43.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.6% | 44.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.3% | 44.7% |
| Q1 26 | 8.3% | 14.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.4% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 11.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.6% | 11.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.9% | 12.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 14.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.5% | 12.4% |
| Q1 26 | 5.9% | 15.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.5% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.6% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.3% | 9.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.7% | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 8.5% |
| Q1 26 | $1.52 | $1.65 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.97 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.91 | $0.66 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.56 | $1.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.28 | $0.76 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.80 | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.37 | $1.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.70 | $0.92 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.0B | $56.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $165.0M | $1.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.4B | $618.9M |
| Total Assets | $4.7B | $2.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.05× | 1.85× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.0B | $56.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $82.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $107.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $356.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $334.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $269.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $224.3M |
| Q1 26 | $165.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $735.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $740.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $745.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $749.7M |
| Q1 26 | $3.4B | $618.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $529.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $498.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6B | $426.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.6B | $400.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $356.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $367.2M |
| Q1 26 | $4.7B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | 0.05× | 1.85× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.53× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.74× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.72× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.85× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.04× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EPAM
Segment breakdown not available.
KTB
| Wrangler U.S | $373.7M | 61% |
| Helly Hansen International | $129.3M | 21% |
| Wrangler International | $62.1M | 10% |
| Helly Hansen U.S | $36.2M | 6% |
| Global Other | $12.0M | 2% |
