vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Essex Property Trust (ESS) and Kontoor Brands, Inc. (KTB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Kontoor Brands, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($853.2M vs $479.6M, roughly 1.8× Essex Property Trust). Essex Property Trust runs the higher net margin — 17.9% vs 4.3%, a 13.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kontoor Brands, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (27.3% vs 5.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Kontoor Brands, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (14.2% CAGR vs 6.0%).
Essex Property Trust is a publicly traded real estate investment trust that invests in apartments in California and in the Seattle metropolitan area.
Kontoor Brands is an American clothing company. It was a spin off from the VF Corporation in May 2019, and markets clothing under the Lee, Wrangler and Helly Hansen brand names.
ESS vs KTB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $479.6M | $853.2M |
| Net Profit | $85.7M | $36.9M |
| Gross Margin | 70.0% | 41.3% |
| Operating Margin | 31.7% | 7.5% |
| Net Margin | 17.9% | 4.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.5% | 27.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -71.6% | -47.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.24 | $0.66 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $479.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $473.3M | $853.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $469.8M | $658.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $464.6M | $622.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $454.5M | $699.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $450.7M | $670.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $442.4M | $606.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $426.9M | $631.2M |
| Q4 25 | $85.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $172.7M | $36.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $231.5M | $73.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $212.8M | $42.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $301.7M | $64.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $125.5M | $70.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $99.0M | $51.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $285.1M | $59.5M |
| Q4 25 | 70.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 69.2% | 41.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 70.7% | 46.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 69.6% | 47.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 70.0% | 43.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 69.5% | 44.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 70.8% | 44.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 69.7% | 45.2% |
| Q4 25 | 31.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.5% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.5% | 11.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 55.3% | 11.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 67.0% | 12.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.6% | 14.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.1% | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.0% | 13.4% |
| Q4 25 | 17.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.5% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.3% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 45.8% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 66.4% | 9.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.8% | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.4% | 8.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 66.8% | 9.4% |
| Q4 25 | $1.24 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.56 | $0.66 | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.44 | $1.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.16 | $0.76 | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.00 | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.84 | $1.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.45 | $0.92 | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.25 | $1.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $76.2M | $82.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.5B | $529.6M |
| Total Assets | $13.2B | $2.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 2.53× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $76.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.0M | $82.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.7M | $107.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $98.7M | $356.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $66.8M | $334.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $71.3M | $269.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $55.2M | $224.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $499.0M | $215.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | $735.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $740.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4B | $745.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2B | $749.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.6B | $779.2M |
| Q4 25 | $5.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.6B | $529.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6B | $498.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.6B | $426.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.5B | $400.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4B | $356.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5B | $367.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.5B | $387.2M |
| Q4 25 | $13.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.2B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.2B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.6B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.9B | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.15× | 2.53× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.14× | 2.74× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.22× | 1.72× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.85× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.18× | 2.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.13× | 2.04× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.19× | 2.01× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.1B | $64.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $55.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 6.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 12.53× | 1.74× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $228.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $342.6M | $64.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $216.1M | $25.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $281.5M | $77.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $82.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $316.2M | $133.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $218.9M | $96.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $314.9M | $56.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $55.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $22.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $74.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $75.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $129.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $92.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $52.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.7% |
| Q4 25 | 12.53× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | 1.74× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.93× | 0.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.32× | 1.81× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.54× | 1.28× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.52× | 1.89× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.21× | 1.86× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.10× | 0.95× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ESS
Segment breakdown not available.
KTB
| International Member | $292.0M | 34% |
| CTC Triangle B.V | $192.7M | 23% |
| Lee Segment | $186.7M | 22% |
| Helly Hansen Segment | $185.9M | 22% |
