vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Essex Property Trust (ESS) and INTERFACE INC (TILE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Essex Property Trust is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($479.6M vs $349.4M, roughly 1.4× INTERFACE INC). Essex Property Trust runs the higher net margin — 17.9% vs 7.0%, a 10.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Essex Property Trust posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.5% vs 4.3%). Over the past eight quarters, INTERFACE INC's revenue compounded faster (9.8% CAGR vs 6.0%).
Essex Property Trust is a publicly traded real estate investment trust that invests in apartments in California and in the Seattle metropolitan area.
Interface, Inc., headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, is a global manufacturer of commercial flooring. The company sells modular carpet tiles, luxury vinyl tile, and Nora brand rubber flooring.
ESS vs TILE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $479.6M | $349.4M |
| Net Profit | $85.7M | $24.4M |
| Gross Margin | 70.0% | 38.6% |
| Operating Margin | 31.7% | 10.1% |
| Net Margin | 17.9% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.5% | 4.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -71.6% | 12.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.24 | $0.41 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $479.6M | $349.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $473.3M | $364.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $469.8M | $375.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $464.6M | $297.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $454.5M | $335.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $450.7M | $344.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $442.4M | $346.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $426.9M | $289.7M |
| Q4 25 | $85.7M | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $172.7M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $231.5M | $32.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $212.8M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $301.7M | $21.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $125.5M | $28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $99.0M | $22.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $285.1M | $14.2M |
| Q4 25 | 70.0% | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 69.2% | 39.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 70.7% | 39.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 69.6% | 37.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 70.0% | 36.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 69.5% | 37.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 70.8% | 35.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 69.7% | 38.1% |
| Q4 25 | 31.7% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.5% | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.5% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 55.3% | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 67.0% | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.6% | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.1% | 11.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.0% | 8.4% |
| Q4 25 | 17.9% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.5% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.3% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 45.8% | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 66.4% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.8% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.4% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 66.8% | 4.9% |
| Q4 25 | $1.24 | $0.41 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.56 | $0.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.44 | $0.55 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.16 | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.00 | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.84 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.45 | $0.38 | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.25 | $0.24 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $76.2M | $71.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $181.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.5B | $640.7M |
| Total Assets | $13.2B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.28× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $76.2M | $71.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.0M | $187.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.7M | $121.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $98.7M | $97.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $66.8M | $99.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $71.3M | $115.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $55.2M | $94.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $499.0M | $89.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $181.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $307.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.4B | $304.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | $302.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $302.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4B | $337.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2B | $387.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.6B | $391.8M |
| Q4 25 | $5.5B | $640.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.6B | $621.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6B | $575.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.6B | $513.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.5B | $489.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4B | $501.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5B | $451.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.5B | $428.5M |
| Q4 25 | $13.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.9B | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.15× | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.14× | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.22× | 0.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.18× | 0.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.13× | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.19× | 0.91× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.1B | $49.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $28.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 8.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 5.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 12.53× | 2.02× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $121.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $49.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $342.6M | $76.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $216.1M | $30.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $281.5M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $38.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $316.2M | $76.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $218.9M | $21.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $314.9M | $12.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $28.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $66.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $22.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $69.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $8.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 12.53× | 2.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | 1.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.93× | 0.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.32× | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.54× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.52× | 2.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.21× | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.10× | 0.89× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ESS
Segment breakdown not available.
TILE
| AMS | $205.9M | 59% |
| EAAA | $143.5M | 41% |
