vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of enCore Energy Corp. (EU) and DNA X, Inc. (SONM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DNA X, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($16.2M vs $12.4M, roughly 1.3× enCore Energy Corp.). DNA X, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -29.3% vs -173.9%, a 144.6% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Devon Energy Corporation is an American company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is organized in Delaware with operational headquarters in the 50-story Devon Energy Center in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Its operations are in the Delaware Basin, Eagle Ford Group, and the Rocky Mountains.
EU vs SONM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $12.4M | $16.2M |
| Net Profit | $-21.5M | $-4.8M |
| Gross Margin | 37.9% | 11.2% |
| Operating Margin | -135.9% | -24.5% |
| Net Margin | -173.9% | -29.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 7.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -89.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $-4.83 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $12.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9M | $16.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7M | $11.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.2M | $16.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $15.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $9.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-21.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.8M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.3M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-24.2M | $458.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-21.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-6.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | 37.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.8% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.8% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.1% | 50.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 25.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 31.8% |
| Q4 25 | -135.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -158.2% | -24.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -526.1% | -60.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -85.7% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 55.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -15.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -56.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -29.5% |
| Q4 25 | -173.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -53.7% | -29.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -172.7% | -66.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -132.9% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -141.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -57.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -31.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.03 | $-4.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.03 | $-0.79 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.13 | $0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-116.99 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-9.32 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.41 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.65 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $52.4M | $2.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $110.0M | $5.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $229.2M | $-701.0K |
| Total Assets | $430.4M | $40.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.48× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $52.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.9M | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.9M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.7M | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $9.3M |
| Q4 25 | $110.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.3M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $229.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $248.6M | $-701.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $264.7M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $267.9M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $15.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $17.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $19.8M |
| Q4 25 | $430.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $441.9M | $40.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $359.4M | $36.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $362.6M | $36.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $39.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $49.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $45.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $42.4M |
| Q4 25 | 0.48× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $12.9M | $-7.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $7.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 57.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 46.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-45.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $12.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.3M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.9M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.7M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-417.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-168.0K |
| Q4 25 | $7.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-26.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-14.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-554.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-198.0K |
| Q4 25 | 57.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -296.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -385.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -64.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -29.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -29.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -2.2% |
| Q4 25 | 46.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 68.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 115.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -20.97× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
