vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Evergy (EVRG) and PERRIGO Co plc (PRGO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Evergy is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.2× PERRIGO Co plc). Evergy runs the higher net margin — 6.5% vs -127.8%, a 134.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Evergy posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.3% vs -2.5%). PERRIGO Co plc produced more free cash flow last quarter ($148.6M vs $-530.5M). Over the past eight quarters, PERRIGO Co plc's revenue compounded faster (1.3% CAGR vs 0.4%).
Evergy, Inc. is an American investor-owned utility (IOU) with publicly traded stock with headquarters in Topeka, Kansas, and in Kansas City, Missouri. The company was formed from a merger of Westar Energy of Topeka and Great Plains Energy of Kansas City, parent company of Kansas City Power & Light. Evergy is the largest electric company in Kansas, serving more than 1.7 million residential, commercial and industrial customers in Kansas and Missouri.
Perrigo Company plc is an American Irish-registered manufacturer of private label over-the-counter pharmaceuticals, and while 70% of Perrigo's net sales are from the U.S. healthcare system, Perrigo is legally headquartered in Ireland for tax purposes, which accounts for 0.60% of net sales. In 2013, Perrigo completed the sixth-largest US corporate tax inversion in history when it reregistered its tax status to Ireland to avoid U.S. corporate taxes. Perrigo maintains its corporate headquarters ...
EVRG vs PRGO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $84.3M | $-1.4B |
| Gross Margin | — | 32.6% |
| Operating Margin | 18.5% | -116.0% |
| Net Margin | 6.5% | -127.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.3% | -2.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.8% | -3093.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.35 | $-10.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $84.3M | $-1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $475.0M | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $171.3M | $-8.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $125.0M | $-6.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.2M | $-44.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $465.6M | $-21.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $207.0M | $-108.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $122.7M | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 32.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 34.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 37.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 37.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 33.1% |
| Q4 25 | 18.5% | -116.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.3% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.4% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.5% | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.1% | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.1% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.4% | -2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.3% | -5.1% |
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | -127.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.9% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.6% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.7% | -0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | -3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.0% | -1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.7% | -10.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.6% | 0.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.35 | $-10.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.03 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.74 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.54 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.34 | $-0.32 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.02 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.90 | $-0.79 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.53 | $0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $19.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.2B | $2.9B |
| Total Assets | $33.9B | $8.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $19.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.5M | $432.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.8M | $454.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.3M | $409.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.0M | $558.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.6M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.1M | $542.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $63.7M | $658.5M |
| Q4 25 | $10.2B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.3B | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.0B | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.9B | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.0B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.7B | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.6B | $4.7B |
| Q4 25 | $33.9B | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.4B | $10.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.9B | $10.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5B | $9.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.3B | $9.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.1B | $11.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.8B | $10.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.3B | $10.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $334.0M | $175.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-530.5M | $148.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -41.1% | 13.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 66.9% | 2.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.96× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-751.7M | $145.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $334.0M | $175.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $937.7M | $51.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.9M | $75.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $449.6M | $-64.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $395.6M | $312.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $953.3M | $42.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $317.5M | $9.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $317.3M | $-1.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-530.5M | $148.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $225.4M | $29.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-303.4M | $56.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-143.2M | $-90.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-118.6M | $274.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $427.0M | $15.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-360.0M | $-18.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-301.3M | $-26.5M |
| Q4 25 | -41.1% | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.8% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -22.4% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -11.1% | -8.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.7% | 24.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -25.6% | -1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.5% | -2.4% |
| Q4 25 | 66.9% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 40.4% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.3% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 45.8% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.9% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.4% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 48.1% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 48.3% | 2.3% |
| Q4 25 | 3.96× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.97× | 6.89× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.89× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.60× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.06× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.05× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.53× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.59× | -0.70× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EVRG
| Electric Utility Customer Class Residential | $462.9M | 36% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Commercial | $447.6M | 35% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Industrial | $164.1M | 13% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Transmission | $129.4M | 10% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Wholesale | $69.7M | 5% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Other Retail | $12.2M | 1% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Industrial Steam | $5.7M | 0% |
PRGO
| Consumer Self Care Americas | $697.0M | 63% |
| Digestive Health | $123.9M | 11% |
| Nutrition | $108.3M | 10% |
| Healthy Lifestyle | $94.8M | 9% |
| Pain And Sleep Aids | $87.1M | 8% |
