vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) and CHART INDUSTRIES INC (GTLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CHART INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.0× Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.). Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 7.1% vs 5.0%, a 2.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-2.4% vs -2.5%). Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($183.7M vs $66.2M). Over the past eight quarters, CHART INDUSTRIES INC's revenue compounded faster (6.6% CAGR vs -1.5%).
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is an American manufacturer of home and security products, headquartered in Deerfield, Illinois. Its portfolio of businesses and brands includes Moen and the House of Rohl; outdoor living and security products from Therma-Tru, Larson, Fiberon, Master Lock and SentrySafe; and MasterBrand Cabinets. Fortune Brands is a Fortune 500 company and part of the S&P 400 Index. As of December 31, 2021, the company reported employing approximately 28,000 associates and pos...
Oricon Inc. , established in 1999, is the holding company at the head of a Japanese corporate group that supplies statistics and information on music and the music industry in Japan and Western music. It started as Original Confidence Inc. , which was founded by Sōkō Koike in November 1967 and became known for its music charts. Oricon Inc. was originally set up as a subsidiary of Original Confidence and took over the latter's Oricon record charts in April 2002.
FBIN vs GTLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $76.3M | $53.6M |
| Gross Margin | 43.8% | 33.3% |
| Operating Margin | 11.3% | 11.6% |
| Net Margin | 7.1% | 5.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.4% | -2.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -27.3% | -32.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.63 | $1.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $950.7M |
| Q4 25 | $76.3M | $53.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $70.8M | $-138.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.3M | $76.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.4M | $49.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $105.0M | $79.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.6M | $69.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.9M | $58.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $96.4M | $11.3M |
| Q4 25 | 43.8% | 33.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.2% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.1% | 33.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.0% | 33.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 46.0% | 33.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.9% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.6% | 33.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.9% | 31.8% |
| Q4 25 | 11.3% | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.0% | -8.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.3% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.4% | 15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.1% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.8% | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.1% | 16.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.0% | 11.9% |
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.2% | -12.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.3% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.5% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.8% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.8% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.7% | 1.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.63 | $1.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.59 | $-3.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.83 | $1.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.42 | $0.94 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.84 | $1.57 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.09 | $1.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.06 | $1.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.76 | $0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $264.0M | $366.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.5B | $3.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.4B | $3.2B |
| Total Assets | $6.5B | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.07× | 1.13× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $264.0M | $366.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.9M | $399.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $234.7M | $342.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $340.0M | $296.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $381.1M | $308.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $344.8M | $310.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $352.6M | $247.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $359.7M | $191.9M |
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7B | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $2.7B |
| Q4 25 | $6.5B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5B | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.6B | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.6B | $9.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6B | $9.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.6B | $9.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.7B | $9.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.8B | $9.2B |
| Q4 25 | 1.07× | 1.13× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.91× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.93× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.16× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.10× | 1.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.12× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.15× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.17× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $208.2M | $88.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $183.7M | $66.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 17.0% | 6.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.3% | 2.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.73× | 1.66× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $366.8M | $202.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $208.2M | $88.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $204.4M | $118.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $149.4M | $145.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-83.4M | $-60.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $272.3M | $281.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $205.3M | $200.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $261.5M | $116.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-71.3M | $-95.1M |
| Q4 25 | $183.7M | $66.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $177.0M | $94.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.7M | $122.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-112.6M | $-80.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $212.1M | $260.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $175.6M | $174.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $222.7M | $88.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-135.9M | $-141.2M |
| Q4 25 | 17.0% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.4% | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.9% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.9% | -8.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.2% | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.0% | 8.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -12.2% | -14.9% |
| Q4 25 | 2.3% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.1% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.8% | 4.8% |
| Q4 25 | 2.73× | 1.66× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.89× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.49× | 1.92× | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.62× | -1.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.59× | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.50× | 2.91× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.95× | 1.98× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.74× | -8.42× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FBIN
| Wholesale Retail Trade | $526.7M | 49% |
| Home Center Retailer | $257.1M | 24% |
| Security Segment | $165.8M | 15% |
| Other Retailer | $118.2M | 11% |
GTLS
| Repair Service And Leasing Segment | $330.4M | 31% |
| Heat Transfer Systems Segment | $325.8M | 30% |
| Specialty Products Segment | $259.5M | 24% |
| Transferred Over Time | $94.4M | 9% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $69.5M | 6% |
