vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of FRANKLIN ELECTRIC CO INC (FELE) and WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC (WWW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($517.5M vs $500.4M, roughly 1.0× FRANKLIN ELECTRIC CO INC). FRANKLIN ELECTRIC CO INC runs the higher net margin — 6.9% vs 6.1%, a 0.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.5% vs 9.9%). Over the past eight quarters, WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC's revenue compounded faster (14.5% CAGR vs -4.0%).

Franklin Electric Co., Inc. is a manufacturer and distributor of products and systems focused on the movement and management of water and energy. The company offers pumps, motors, drives, and controls for use in a variety of residential, commercial, agricultural, industrial, and municipal applications. Headquartered in Fort Wayne, Indiana, the company also operates manufacturing facilities in the United States, Germany, Czech Republic, Italy, Turkey, Mexico, Brazil, Australia, South Africa, C...

Wolverine World Wide is a global designer, manufacturer and marketer of branded footwear, apparel and accessories. It owns popular brands including Merrell, Sperry, Saucony and Hush Puppies, serving outdoor, casual, workwear and athletic segments via e-commerce, retail stores and global wholesale networks.

FELE vs WWW — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
WWW
WWW
1.0× larger
WWW
$517.5M
$500.4M
FELE
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
WWW
WWW
+15.6% gap
WWW
25.5%
9.9%
FELE
Higher net margin
FELE
FELE
0.8% more per $
FELE
6.9%
6.1%
WWW
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
WWW
WWW
Annualised
WWW
14.5%
-4.0%
FELE

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
FELE
FELE
WWW
WWW
Revenue
$500.4M
$517.5M
Net Profit
$34.7M
$31.8M
Gross Margin
35.0%
47.3%
Operating Margin
9.6%
9.7%
Net Margin
6.9%
6.1%
Revenue YoY
9.9%
25.5%
Net Profit YoY
10.6%
162.8%
EPS (diluted)
$0.77
$0.37

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
FELE
FELE
WWW
WWW
Q1 26
$500.4M
$517.5M
Q4 25
$506.9M
Q3 25
$581.7M
$470.3M
Q2 25
$587.4M
$474.2M
Q1 25
$455.2M
$412.3M
Q4 24
$485.7M
$494.7M
Q3 24
$531.4M
$440.2M
Q2 24
$543.3M
$425.2M
Net Profit
FELE
FELE
WWW
WWW
Q1 26
$34.7M
$31.8M
Q4 25
$39.3M
Q3 25
$16.7M
$25.1M
Q2 25
$60.1M
$26.8M
Q1 25
$31.0M
$12.1M
Q4 24
$33.7M
$23.1M
Q3 24
$54.6M
$23.2M
Q2 24
$59.1M
$13.8M
Gross Margin
FELE
FELE
WWW
WWW
Q1 26
35.0%
47.3%
Q4 25
33.8%
Q3 25
35.9%
47.5%
Q2 25
36.1%
47.2%
Q1 25
36.0%
47.2%
Q4 24
33.8%
43.4%
Q3 24
35.7%
45.1%
Q2 24
36.8%
43.1%
Operating Margin
FELE
FELE
WWW
WWW
Q1 26
9.6%
9.7%
Q4 25
10.2%
Q3 25
14.6%
8.4%
Q2 25
15.0%
8.6%
Q1 25
9.7%
4.8%
Q4 24
8.9%
7.4%
Q3 24
13.8%
7.9%
Q2 24
14.6%
6.8%
Net Margin
FELE
FELE
WWW
WWW
Q1 26
6.9%
6.1%
Q4 25
7.7%
Q3 25
2.9%
5.3%
Q2 25
10.2%
5.7%
Q1 25
6.8%
2.9%
Q4 24
6.9%
4.7%
Q3 24
10.3%
5.3%
Q2 24
10.9%
3.2%
EPS (diluted)
FELE
FELE
WWW
WWW
Q1 26
$0.77
$0.37
Q4 25
$0.87
Q3 25
$0.37
$0.30
Q2 25
$1.31
$0.32
Q1 25
$0.67
$0.15
Q4 24
$0.73
$0.29
Q3 24
$1.17
$0.28
Q2 24
$1.26
$0.17

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
FELE
FELE
WWW
WWW
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$80.4M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$134.4M
$621.7M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.3B
$408.0M
Total Assets
$2.0B
$1.7B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.10×
1.52×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
FELE
FELE
WWW
WWW
Q1 26
$80.4M
Q4 25
$99.7M
Q3 25
$102.9M
Q2 25
$104.6M
Q1 25
$84.0M
Q4 24
$220.5M
Q3 24
$106.3M
Q2 24
$58.1M
Total Debt
FELE
FELE
WWW
WWW
Q1 26
$134.4M
$621.7M
Q4 25
$135.2M
Q3 25
$135.2M
$676.4M
Q2 25
$14.5M
$708.5M
Q1 25
$14.9M
$710.8M
Q4 24
$11.6M
$648.0M
Q3 24
$11.6M
$702.8M
Q2 24
$87.2M
$814.7M
Stockholders' Equity
FELE
FELE
WWW
WWW
Q1 26
$1.3B
$408.0M
Q4 25
$1.3B
Q3 25
$1.3B
$376.7M
Q2 25
$1.3B
$344.0M
Q1 25
$1.3B
$310.6M
Q4 24
$1.3B
$312.9M
Q3 24
$1.3B
$295.2M
Q2 24
$1.2B
$262.1M
Total Assets
FELE
FELE
WWW
WWW
Q1 26
$2.0B
$1.7B
Q4 25
$1.9B
Q3 25
$2.0B
$1.7B
Q2 25
$2.0B
$1.8B
Q1 25
$1.9B
$1.7B
Q4 24
$1.8B
$1.7B
Q3 24
$1.8B
$1.8B
Q2 24
$1.8B
$1.8B
Debt / Equity
FELE
FELE
WWW
WWW
Q1 26
0.10×
1.52×
Q4 25
0.10×
Q3 25
0.10×
1.80×
Q2 25
0.01×
2.06×
Q1 25
0.01×
2.29×
Q4 24
0.01×
2.07×
Q3 24
0.01×
2.38×
Q2 24
0.07×
3.11×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
FELE
FELE
WWW
WWW
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$146.2M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$145.6M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
28.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.1%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
4.60×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$125.5M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
FELE
FELE
WWW
WWW
Q1 26
$146.2M
Q4 25
$104.2M
Q3 25
$102.7M
$33.0M
Q2 25
$51.5M
$44.6M
Q1 25
$-19.5M
$-83.8M
Q4 24
$110.3M
$82.4M
Q3 24
$116.1M
$108.2M
Q2 24
$36.4M
$26.7M
Free Cash Flow
FELE
FELE
WWW
WWW
Q1 26
$145.6M
Q4 25
$88.7M
Q3 25
$91.3M
$30.1M
Q2 25
$39.9M
$41.2M
Q1 25
$-26.3M
$-91.4M
Q4 24
$97.5M
$74.4M
Q3 24
$106.6M
$104.1M
Q2 24
$26.1M
$23.7M
FCF Margin
FELE
FELE
WWW
WWW
Q1 26
28.1%
Q4 25
17.5%
Q3 25
15.7%
6.4%
Q2 25
6.8%
8.7%
Q1 25
-5.8%
-22.2%
Q4 24
20.1%
15.0%
Q3 24
20.1%
23.6%
Q2 24
4.8%
5.6%
Capex Intensity
FELE
FELE
WWW
WWW
Q1 26
0.1%
Q4 25
3.1%
Q3 25
2.0%
0.6%
Q2 25
2.0%
0.7%
Q1 25
1.5%
1.8%
Q4 24
2.6%
1.6%
Q3 24
1.8%
0.9%
Q2 24
1.9%
0.7%
Cash Conversion
FELE
FELE
WWW
WWW
Q1 26
4.60×
Q4 25
2.65×
Q3 25
6.14×
1.31×
Q2 25
0.86×
1.66×
Q1 25
-0.63×
-6.93×
Q4 24
3.28×
3.57×
Q3 24
2.13×
4.66×
Q2 24
0.62×
1.93×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

FELE
FELE

Segment breakdown not available.

WWW
WWW

Sales Channel Through Intermediary$230.2M44%
Sales Channel Directly To Consumer$142.6M28%
Work Group$134.0M26%
Other$10.7M2%

Related Comparisons