vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BingEx Ltd (FLX) and Oportun Financial Corp (OPRT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Oportun Financial Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($247.7M vs $143.2M, roughly 1.7× BingEx Ltd). BingEx Ltd runs the higher net margin — 2.2% vs 1.4%, a 0.9% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Oportun Financial Corp is a US-based fintech firm that provides accessible, responsible financial services including personal loans, credit cards, and savings products to underserved low-to-moderate income consumers, many with limited or no credit history, leveraging proprietary AI underwriting to deliver fair terms while mitigating operational risk.
FLX vs OPRT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $143.2M | $247.7M |
| Net Profit | $3.2M | $3.4M |
| Gross Margin | 10.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 2.6% |
| Net Margin | 2.2% | 1.4% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -1.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -61.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $143.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $247.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $141.2M | $238.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.0M | $234.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $141.0M | $235.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $250.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $164.6M | $250.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $250.4M |
| Q1 26 | $3.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1M | $5.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.6M | $9.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4M | $-30.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-31.0M |
| Q1 26 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 89.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | -15.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -19.6% |
| Q1 26 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.4% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.6% | 4.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 200.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | -12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -12.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.75 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.78 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $561.1M | $105.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $390.1M |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $3.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $561.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $105.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $628.6M | $104.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $499.4M | $96.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $592.4M | $78.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $60.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $517.4M | $71.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $72.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $390.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $383.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $376.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $366.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $353.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $327.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $354.1M |
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $926.8M | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $413.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 121.45× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $413.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $99.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $104.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $101.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $393.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $108.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $107.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 121.45× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.20× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.34× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 45.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
