vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Fabrinet (FN) and Gen Digital (GEN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gen Digital is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.1× Fabrinet). Gen Digital runs the higher net margin — 15.5% vs 9.9%, a 5.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fabrinet posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (35.9% vs 28.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Fabrinet's revenue compounded faster (24.4% CAGR vs 13.2%).
FabrinetFNEarnings & Financial Report
Below is a list of companies having stocks that are included in the S&P MidCap 400 stock market index. The index, maintained by S&P Dow Jones Indices, comprises the common stocks of 400 mid-cap, mostly American, companies. Although called the S&P 400, the index sometimes contains more than 400 stocks when it includes two or more share classes of stock from one of its component companies.
Gen Digital Inc. is a multinational software company co-headquartered in both Tempe, Arizona (USA) and Prague, Czech Republic (EU). The company provides cybersecurity software, financial technology, and services. Gen is a Fortune 500 company and a member of the S&P 500 stock-market index. It is listed at both NASDAQ and Prague Stock Exchange. Its portfolio includes Norton, Avast, LifeLock, Avira, AVG, ReputationDefender, MoneyLion and CCleaner.
FN vs GEN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $112.6M | $192.0M |
| Gross Margin | 12.2% | 78.4% |
| Operating Margin | 10.1% | 34.9% |
| Net Margin | 9.9% | 15.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 35.9% | 28.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 30.0% | 6.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.11 | $0.31 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $978.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $909.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $871.8M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $833.6M | $986.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $804.2M | $974.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $753.3M | $965.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $192.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $112.6M | $134.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.9M | $135.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $87.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $81.3M | $142.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $86.6M | $159.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $77.4M | $161.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $81.1M | $181.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 78.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.2% | 78.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.9% | 78.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.7% | 80.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.1% | 80.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.3% | 80.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.3% | 80.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 34.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.1% | 35.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.6% | 35.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | 41.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.5% | 37.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.6% | 41.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 43.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.8% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 16.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.6% | 16.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.8% | 18.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.31 | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.11 | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.66 | $0.22 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.41 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.25 | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.38 | $0.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.13 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.22 | $0.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $960.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $8.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.2B | $2.3B |
| Total Assets | $3.3B | $15.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.61× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $960.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $968.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $934.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $950.7M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $934.6M | $883.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $908.9M | $737.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $858.6M | $644.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $15.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | $16.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | $16.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $15.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $15.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $15.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $15.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.61× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.64× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.94× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.33× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $46.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-5.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.41× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $102.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $46.3M | $541.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $102.6M | $409.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $74.2M | $473.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.9M | $326.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.2M | $158.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.1M | $264.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-5.3M | $535.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.3M | $405.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.7M | $470.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $94.0M | $318.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.9M | $156.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $70.4M | $262.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.5% | 43.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | 32.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.2% | 46.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.3% | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.8% | 16.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.3% | 27.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.6% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 0.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.41× | 4.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.07× | 3.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.91× | 3.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.34× | 2.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.07× | 0.98× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.02× | 1.46× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FN
| Optical Communications | $832.6M | 73% |
| Non Optical Communications | $300.3M | 27% |
GEN
| Cyber Safety Platform | $819.0M | 66% |
| Trust Based Solutions | $421.0M | 34% |
| Net Interest Income On Notes Receivable | $4.0M | 0% |
