vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND) and Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $809.5M, roughly 1.4× Construction Partners, Inc.). Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 3.5% vs 2.1%, a 1.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Construction Partners, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (44.1% vs 2.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Construction Partners, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (47.6% CAGR vs -0.2%).
Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc., branded as Floor & Decor, is a multi-channel American specialty retailer of hard surface flooring and related accessories that was founded in 2000 and headquartered in Smyrna, Georgia, United States.
Alexander Construction Company was a Palm Springs, California, residential development company that built over 2,200 houses in the Coachella Valley of Riverside County, California, between 1955 and 1965.
FND vs ROAD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $809.5M |
| Net Profit | $39.3M | $17.2M |
| Gross Margin | 43.5% | 15.0% |
| Operating Margin | 4.6% | 6.2% |
| Net Margin | 3.5% | 2.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.0% | 44.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -17.2% | 663.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.36 | $0.31 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $809.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $899.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $779.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $571.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $561.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $538.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $517.8M |
| Q1 26 | $39.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $39.3M | $17.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.3M | $56.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.2M | $44.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.9M | $4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.5M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.7M | $29.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.7M | $30.9M |
| Q1 26 | 43.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 43.5% | 15.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.4% | 17.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 43.9% | 16.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.8% | 12.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.5% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.5% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.3% | 16.1% |
| Q1 26 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.6% | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.7% | 10.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.5% | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.9% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.3% | 8.8% |
| Q1 26 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.5% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.2% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.0% | 6.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.36 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.36 | $0.31 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.53 | $1.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.58 | $0.79 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.45 | $0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.44 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.48 | $0.55 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.52 | $0.59 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $249.3M | $104.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.4B | $969.1M |
| Total Assets | $5.5B | $3.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $249.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $104.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $156.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $114.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $101.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $132.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $74.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $56.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $515.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $969.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $912.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $853.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | $807.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $811.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $573.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $552.9M |
| Q1 26 | $5.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.5B | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4B | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8B | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.78× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.90× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $381.8M | $82.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $47.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 5.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 9.71× | 4.80× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $186.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $381.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $124.1M | $82.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $102.5M | $112.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.1M | $83.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.2M | $55.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.4M | $40.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $160.3M | $95.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $194.0M | $34.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $45.1M | $47.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.5M | $78.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.0M | $46.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4M | $14.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9M | $13.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $36.5M | $78.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.0M | $19.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.8% | 5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | 3.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.8% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.1% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.1% | 2.9% |
| Q1 26 | 9.71× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.15× | 4.80× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.79× | 1.98× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.33× | 1.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.46× | 13.20× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.14× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.10× | 3.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.42× | 1.12× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.