vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Forestar Group Inc. (FOR) and Savers Value Village, Inc. (SVV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Savers Value Village, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($426.9M vs $273.0M, roughly 1.6× Forestar Group Inc.). Forestar Group Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.6% vs -3.3%, a 8.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Forestar Group Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.0% vs 8.1%). Savers Value Village, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-6.3M vs $-157.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Savers Value Village, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (4.3% CAGR vs -9.6%).
Forestar Group Inc. is a residential lot development company based in Arlington, Texas. The company has operations in 51 markets in 21 states and delivered 11,518 residential lots during the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2020. The company is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange and in October 2017 became a majority-owned subsidiary of D.R. Horton, Inc., the largest homebuilder by volume in the United States since 2002. The company primarily acquires entitled real estate and...
Value Village Stores, Inc. was a Midwestern United States chain of retail stores aimed at the discount department-store market. Henry Horney, formerly of F.W. Woolworth Company founded a small, regional chain of discount stores located in the two states of Wisconsin and Illinois that opened in 1961 and operated into 1989. Horney also had a real estate company and often built small shopping malls adjoining the discount stores. The chain had no relation to the Savers Value Village chain of thri...
FOR vs SVV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $273.0M | $426.9M |
| Net Profit | $15.4M | $-14.0M |
| Gross Margin | 20.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 7.6% | 8.5% |
| Net Margin | 5.6% | -3.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.0% | 8.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -6.7% | -164.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.30 | $-0.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $273.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $670.5M | $426.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $390.5M | $417.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $351.0M | $370.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $250.4M | $402.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $551.3M | $394.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $318.4M | $386.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $333.8M | $354.2M |
| Q4 25 | $15.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.9M | $-14.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.9M | $18.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.6M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.5M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $81.5M | $21.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.7M | $9.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $45.0M | $-467.0K |
| Q4 25 | 20.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.9% | 25.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.5% | 26.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.9% | 24.2% |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.9% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.2% | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.6% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.7% | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.2% | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.6% | 4.6% |
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.0% | -3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.4% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.6% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.8% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.2% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.5% | -0.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.30 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.70 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.65 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.62 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.32 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.59 | $0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.76 | $0.06 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.89 | $0.00 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $211.7M | $63.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $793.2M | $750.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.8B | $414.6M |
| Total Assets | $3.2B | $2.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.44× | 1.81× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $211.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $379.2M | $63.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $189.2M | $70.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $174.3M | $73.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $132.0M | $150.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $481.2M | $137.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $359.2M | $160.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $416.2M | $102.2M |
| Q4 25 | $793.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $802.7M | $750.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $872.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $872.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $806.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $706.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $706.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $705.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $414.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $423.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $413.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $421.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $432.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $419.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $395.0M |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.45× | 1.81× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.52× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.53× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.48× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-157.0M | $21.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-157.1M | $-6.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -57.5% | -1.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 6.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -10.19× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $93.0M | $25.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-157.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $256.3M | $21.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.8M | $54.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-19.8M | $419.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-450.0M | $55.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.2M | $23.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-61.7M | $60.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-59.2M | $-5.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-157.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $255.6M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.0M | $21.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.5M | $-20.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $118.4M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-62.3M | $29.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-59.8M | $-28.3M |
| Q4 25 | -57.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.1% | -1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.8% | -5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.5% | -0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -19.6% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -17.9% | -8.0% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 5.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 6.4% |
| Q4 25 | -10.19× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.48× | 2.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.63× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -27.27× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.46× | 1.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.59× | 6.22× | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.32× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FOR
| D.R.Horton Inc. | $183.8M | 67% |
| Other | $89.2M | 33% |
SVV
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $408.3M | 96% |
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $18.6M | 4% |
