vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Foxx Development Holdings Inc. (FOXX) and TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC (TACT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Foxx Development Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($16.7M vs $11.5M, roughly 1.5× TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC). On growth, TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.9% vs -4.4%).
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
FOXX vs TACT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $16.7M | $11.5M |
| Net Profit | $-4.3M | — |
| Gross Margin | 13.3% | 47.6% |
| Operating Margin | -13.3% | -10.1% |
| Net Margin | -25.6% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -4.4% | 11.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -400.9% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.62 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $16.7M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.2M | $13.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.9M | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.4M | $13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.5M | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.1M | $10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $10.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-4.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.9M | $15.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.1M | $-143.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.1M | $19.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.3M | $-551.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-319.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | 13.3% | 47.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.6% | 49.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.9% | 48.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.8% | 48.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.5% | 44.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | 48.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 52.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 52.6% |
| Q4 25 | -13.3% | -10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.0% | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -31.3% | -0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -12.8% | -10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.8% | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -12.2% |
| Q4 25 | -25.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -14.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -29.4% | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -35.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -9.8% | -5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -9.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.62 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.42 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.44 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.58 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.20 | $-0.80 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.65 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.8M | $20.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $84.8K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-11.8M | $31.1M |
| Total Assets | $42.0M | $44.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.8M | $20.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9M | $17.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8M | $14.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.2M | $11.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $10.6M |
| Q4 25 | $84.8K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $90.2K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $97.2K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $100.5K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $105.5K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $110.3K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $-11.8M | $31.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.9M | $31.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.4M | $31.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.6M | $30.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2M | $30.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $457.2K | $38.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $38.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $38.6M |
| Q4 25 | $42.0M | $44.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.8M | $45.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.0M | $44.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.9M | $44.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.9M | $44.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.5M | $50.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $50.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $51.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.24× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $284.2K | $609.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $589.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 5.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $7.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $284.2K | $609.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-376.8K | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.9M | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-178.4K | $-161.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.2M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-243.5K | $327.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $636.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $589.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-171.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.3M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-278.5K | $259.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $499.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -24.4% | 23.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.2% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -14.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 242.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -8.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.97× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
