vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Farmland Partners Inc. (FPI) and EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC. (MRAM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Farmland Partners Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($20.7M vs $14.9M, roughly 1.4× EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC.). Farmland Partners Inc. runs the higher net margin — 103.4% vs -2.0%, a 105.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.2% vs -3.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Farmland Partners Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (31.4% CAGR vs 18.2%).
Farmland Industries was the largest agricultural cooperative in North America when it eventually sold all of its assets in 2002–04. During its 74-year history, Farmland served its farmer membership as a diversified, integrated organization, playing a significant role in agricultural markets both domestically and worldwide.
Everspin Technologies, Inc. is a publicly traded semiconductor company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona, United States. It develops and manufactures discrete magnetoresistive RAM or magnetoresistive random-access memory (MRAM) products, including Toggle MRAM and Spin-Transfer Torque MRAM (STT-MRAM) product families. It also licenses its technology for use in embedded MRAM (eMRAM) applications, magnetic sensor applications as well as performs backend foundry services for eMRAM.
FPI vs MRAM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $20.7M | $14.9M |
| Net Profit | $21.4M | $-296.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 52.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | 29.0% |
| Net Margin | 103.4% | -2.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.5% | 13.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -63.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | $-0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $14.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $20.7M | $14.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.3M | $14.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.0M | $13.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.3M | $13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.5M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.3M | $12.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.4M | $10.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-296.0K | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.4M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $483.0K | $54.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.6M | $-670.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.7M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.0M | $-2.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | 52.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 50.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 51.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 51.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 51.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 51.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 49.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 49.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 29.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -7.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | -11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 78.2% | -14.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.6% | -14.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.9% | -17.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -17.9% | -26.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | -2.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 103.4% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 76.3% | -5.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | -8.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 273.6% | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.5% | 18.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -17.5% | -23.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.44 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.00 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.14 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.09 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.02 | $0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.06 | $-0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $40.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $161.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $467.4M | $70.2M |
| Total Assets | $719.1M | $83.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.35× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $40.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $44.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $45.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $45.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $42.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $39.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $36.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $161.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $170.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $193.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $202.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $204.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $394.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $393.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $70.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $467.4M | $68.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $457.3M | $65.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $473.5M | $64.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $492.2M | $63.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.6M | $62.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $519.4M | $59.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $521.5M | $55.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $83.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $719.1M | $84.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $738.5M | $80.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $776.7M | $78.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $810.5M | $80.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $869.6M | $77.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $72.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $64.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.37× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.76× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.75× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $17.4M | $570.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.81× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $570.0K | ||
| Q4 25 | $17.4M | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.0M | $881.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $5.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.4M | $1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.1M | $3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.3M | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.1M | $1.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-975.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $543.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $527.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 22.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 24.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.81× | 2.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.04× | 16.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.29× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.12× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.27× | 3.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.39× | 1.25× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FPI
Segment breakdown not available.
MRAM
| Product sales | $14.1M | 95% |
| Licensing, royalty, patent, engineering services and other revenue | $772.0K | 5% |