vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) and INTERFACE INC (TILE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
INTERFACE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($349.4M vs $336.0M, roughly 1.0× Federal Realty Investment Trust). Federal Realty Investment Trust runs the higher net margin — 38.6% vs 7.0%, a 31.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Federal Realty Investment Trust posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.7% vs 4.3%). Over the past eight quarters, INTERFACE INC's revenue compounded faster (9.8% CAGR vs 6.5%).
Federal Realty Investment Trust is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers in the Northeastern United States, the Mid-Atlantic states, California, and South Florida.
Interface, Inc., headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, is a global manufacturer of commercial flooring. The company sells modular carpet tiles, luxury vinyl tile, and Nora brand rubber flooring.
FRT vs TILE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $336.0M | $349.4M |
| Net Profit | $129.7M | $24.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 38.6% |
| Operating Margin | 53.8% | 10.1% |
| Net Margin | 38.6% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.7% | 4.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 103.5% | 12.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.49 | $0.41 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $336.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $336.0M | $349.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $322.3M | $364.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.5M | $375.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $309.2M | $297.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $311.4M | $335.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $303.6M | $344.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $296.1M | $346.6M |
| Q1 26 | $129.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $129.7M | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.6M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $155.9M | $32.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $63.8M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.5M | $21.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.0M | $28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $112.0M | $22.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 39.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 37.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 35.4% |
| Q1 26 | 53.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 53.8% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.3% | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 65.1% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.1% | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.9% | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 53.0% | 11.0% |
| Q1 26 | 38.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.6% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.1% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 50.0% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.6% | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.1% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.8% | 6.5% |
| Q1 26 | $1.49 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.49 | $0.41 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.69 | $0.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.78 | $0.55 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.72 | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.74 | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.70 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.32 | $0.38 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $107.4M | $71.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.0B | $181.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.2B | $640.7M |
| Total Assets | $9.1B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.53× | 0.28× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $107.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $107.4M | $71.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $111.3M | $187.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.0M | $121.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $109.2M | $97.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $123.4M | $99.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $97.0M | $115.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $103.2M | $94.2M |
| Q1 26 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.0B | $181.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $307.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $304.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $302.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $302.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $337.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $387.6M |
| Q1 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $640.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $621.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $575.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $513.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $489.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $501.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $451.2M |
| Q1 26 | $9.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.4B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | 1.53× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.53× | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.42× | 0.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.86× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $49.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $28.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 8.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 5.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.02× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $121.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $622.4M | $49.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $147.8M | $76.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $150.7M | $30.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $179.0M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $574.6M | $38.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $144.1M | $76.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $169.7M | $21.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $28.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $66.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $22.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $69.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $12.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.80× | 2.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.40× | 1.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.97× | 0.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.81× | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.77× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.36× | 2.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.52× | 0.95× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FRT
Segment breakdown not available.
TILE
| AMS | $205.9M | 59% |
| EAAA | $143.5M | 41% |
