vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FITLIFE BRANDS, INC. (FTLF) and EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC. (MRAM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FITLIFE BRANDS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($25.9M vs $14.9M, roughly 1.7× EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC.). FITLIFE BRANDS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 6.3% vs -2.0%, a 8.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FITLIFE BRANDS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (72.6% vs 13.2%). Over the past eight quarters, FITLIFE BRANDS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (25.1% CAGR vs 18.2%).
FitLife Brands, Inc. is a health and wellness firm developing, marketing and distributing premium nutritional supplements, sports nutrition products and weight management solutions. It serves North American fitness enthusiasts, athletes and health-focused consumers via retail and e-commerce channels.
Everspin Technologies, Inc. is a publicly traded semiconductor company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona, United States. It develops and manufactures discrete magnetoresistive RAM or magnetoresistive random-access memory (MRAM) products, including Toggle MRAM and Spin-Transfer Torque MRAM (STT-MRAM) product families. It also licenses its technology for use in embedded MRAM (eMRAM) applications, magnetic sensor applications as well as performs backend foundry services for eMRAM.
FTLF vs MRAM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $25.9M | $14.9M |
| Net Profit | $1.6M | $-296.0K |
| Gross Margin | 34.5% | 52.7% |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | 29.0% |
| Net Margin | 6.3% | -2.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 72.6% | 13.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -20.8% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.16 | $-0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $14.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $25.9M | $14.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.5M | $14.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.1M | $13.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.9M | $13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.0M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.0M | $12.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.9M | $10.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-296.0K | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $921.0K | $54.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7M | $-670.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6M | $-2.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | 52.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 34.5% | 50.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.2% | 51.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.8% | 51.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.1% | 51.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.4% | 51.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.8% | 49.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.8% | 49.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 29.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.8% | -7.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | -11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.6% | -14.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.6% | -14.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.2% | -11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | -17.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.7% | -26.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | -2.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.3% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.8% | -5.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.7% | -8.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.8% | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.3% | 18.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.5% | -23.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.16 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.09 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.18 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.20 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.22 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.21 | $0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.27 | $-0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $40.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $43.6M | $70.2M |
| Total Assets | $106.3M | $83.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $40.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $44.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $45.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $45.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $42.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $39.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $36.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $70.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $43.6M | $68.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.9M | $65.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.9M | $64.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.9M | $63.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.1M | $62.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.2M | $59.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.9M | $55.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $83.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $106.3M | $84.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $110.0M | $80.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.8M | $78.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $62.2M | $80.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.5M | $77.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.6M | $72.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $57.3M | $64.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.11× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $244.0K | $570.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $239.0K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.15× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $7.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $570.0K | ||
| Q4 25 | $244.0K | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7M | $881.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $5.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $957.0K | $3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0M | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $1.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $239.0K | $-975.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7M | $543.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $527.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.6% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | 22.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 24.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 15.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 0.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.15× | 2.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.99× | 16.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.15× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.46× | 3.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.96× | 1.25× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.60× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FTLF
| US | $24.3M | 94% |
| Other | $1.7M | 6% |
MRAM
| Product sales | $14.1M | 95% |
| Licensing, royalty, patent, engineering services and other revenue | $772.0K | 5% |
