vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Avidia Bancorp, Inc. (AVBC) and EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC. (MRAM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Avidia Bancorp, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.8M vs $14.9M, roughly 1.8× EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC.). Avidia Bancorp, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 22.9% vs -2.0%, a 24.9% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Avidia Bank is an American mutual community bank headquartered in Hudson, Massachusetts. It was founded in 2007 when it was formed by a merger between Hudson Savings Bank and Westborough Bank.
Everspin Technologies, Inc. is a publicly traded semiconductor company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona, United States. It develops and manufactures discrete magnetoresistive RAM or magnetoresistive random-access memory (MRAM) products, including Toggle MRAM and Spin-Transfer Torque MRAM (STT-MRAM) product families. It also licenses its technology for use in embedded MRAM (eMRAM) applications, magnetic sensor applications as well as performs backend foundry services for eMRAM.
AVBC vs MRAM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.8M | $14.9M |
| Net Profit | $5.3M | $-296.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 52.7% |
| Operating Margin | 33.3% | 29.0% |
| Net Margin | 22.9% | -2.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 13.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $14.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $26.8M | $14.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.0M | $14.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.9M | $13.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.9M | $13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $12.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-296.0K | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.3M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-907.0K | $54.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | $-670.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.6M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | 52.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 50.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 51.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 51.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 51.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 51.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 49.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 49.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 29.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 33.3% | -7.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.0% | -11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.4% | -14.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -72.0% | -14.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -17.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -26.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | -2.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.9% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.2% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.0% | -5.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -50.5% | -8.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 18.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -23.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.05 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $275.0M | $40.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $379.0M | $70.2M |
| Total Assets | $2.8B | $83.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $40.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $275.0M | $44.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $208.3M | $45.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $592.5M | $45.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $42.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $39.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $36.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $70.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $379.0M | $68.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $372.0M | $65.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $191.4M | $64.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $186.1M | $63.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $62.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $59.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $55.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $83.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | $84.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $80.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | $78.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $80.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $77.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $72.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $64.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $28.4M | $570.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $24.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 89.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 16.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.32× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $40.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $570.0K | ||
| Q4 25 | $28.4M | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.1M | $881.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $5.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.2M | $1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $24.1M | $-975.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.3M | $543.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.3M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.9M | $527.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 89.9% | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 83.2% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.8% | 22.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -16.9% | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | 24.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 15.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.2% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.32× | 2.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.60× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.25× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AVBC
Segment breakdown not available.
MRAM
| Product sales | $14.1M | 95% |
| Licensing, royalty, patent, engineering services and other revenue | $772.0K | 5% |
